If pacquiao and ward were the same weight who would win?
Collapse
-
Look man, this is clearly a hypothetical situation, they are not now and never will be the same size, fight in the same class, none of that. I thought the purpose of this thread was to imagine that there was some imaginary situation in which the the two guys were the same size and fought in the same weight class but had relatively the same attributes that they have currently.No friend. If they're the same weight, their body mass doesnt change. Ward would always be bigger if we are going by their actual dimensions. The question was if they were the same weight. Ward would still be a 6'0 welterweight who is physically stronger and has great IQ and boxing skills. Pac wins? He would be the underdog. Heck Pac would be a underdog against Mayweather and ward is like a bigger stronger Mayweather (If Ward and Pac were welterweights) are you guys understanding the question? youre talking about a huge difference in size, height and body mass wise. Airheads lol.. Bet noone thought of that before throwing their pom poms on
A SMW Pac beat s a SMW Ward....that simple enough for you? Just like a WW Pac scares a WW Floyd to death...there is a reason for that fear and that fear would exist at SMW as well.
***And by the way...weight = mass x the force of gravity....the force of gravity ain't changing so what exactly must change for them to have the same weight?Last edited by mathed; 09-28-2014, 11:17 PM.Comment
-
-
You guys dont even follow logic. The funny thing is I hate all fighters involed. I actually hate eeveryone BUT I cant help but laugh at people who say Pac 1would beat a 6'0 Andre Ward, at 122, 147 OR 168.. Unless we're going to pretend and add inches to his height . I know that adds inches to you pac-tuurds diicks, but lets be objective .Last edited by MrP4P; 09-28-2014, 11:22 PM.Comment
-
Hes still 6 inches bigger, with much longer reach and smarter technical fighter. You dont get that same weight doesnt mean they're the same height?Look man, this is clearly a hypothetical situation, they are not now and never will be the same size, fight in the same class, none of that. I thought the purpose of this thread was to imagine that there was some imaginary situation in which the the two guys were the same size and fought in the same weight class but had relatively the same attributes that they have currently.
A SMW Pac beat s a SMW Ward....that simple enough for you? Just like a WW Pac scares a WW Floyd to death...there is a reason for that fear and that fear would exist at SMW as well.
***And by the way...weight = mass x the force of gravity....the force of gravity ain't changing so what exactly must change for them to have the same weight?Comment
-
Bro...you should rethink your remarks before you hit post because you are ******** dead wrong with your "logic" or lack there of. Height doesn't mean schit bro.....we are talking about an imaginary situation to begin with...you can't take a smw and put him at ww or a ww at smw without adding or subtracting mass. That is simple physics man, you should take a course first before making a fool out of yourself.You guys dont even follow logic. The funny thing is I hate all fighters involed. I actually hate eeveryone BUT I cant help but laugh at people who say Pac 1would beat a 6'0 Andre Ward, at 122, 147 OR 168.. Unless we're going to pretend and add inches to his height . I know that add inches to you pac-tuurds diicks, but lets be objective .Comment
-
So how thin would Ward have to be to fight at 147? Would his reach, height, skills, any of that really matter? No, he'd be a zombie and get his ass whooped.Comment
-
Dude for someone that so badly misunderstands the meaning of p4p you're awful loud abou it. So let me see, Wlad crushes Floyd p4p cause hed be an 6'6 welter? YPL is 6'4 so p4p > Floyd. Huck also. This is what youre saying, pal. Rigo is a p4p weakling cause hed be a 5'4 welter with puny reach.Comment
-
Comment

Comment