Comments Thread For: Amir Khan Says Guerrero, Alexander Still The Targets

[Dirk Diggler UK]

I don't know about stepping it up and fights getting progressively tougher. Most of those fights ****** period and he dumped a tough Alexander fight because he thought he could skip to a lucrative Mayweather one -- not that there is anything wrong with that. Actually, if Khan fights Alexander now he should get plenty of credit.

Diaz is clearly better than Molina and Collazo is clearly better than Diaz. So they were progressively tougher. Now he's looking for a bigger name to prepare for a Mayweather fight in May. I reckon it'll be Guerrero.

[IMDAZED]

Diaz is clearly better than Molina and Collazo is clearly better than Diaz. So they were progressively tougher. Now he's looking for a bigger name to prepare for a Mayweather fight in May. I reckon it'll be Guerrero.

Again, most of those fights ****** period whether they were progressively better or not. At that rate, he'll never face an elite fighter. Anyway, I think it'll be Guerrero too because Alexander is the tougher fight for him IMO.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Again, most of those fights ****** period whether they were progressively better or not. At that rate, he'll never face an elite fighter. Anyway, I think it'll be Guerrero too because Alexander is the tougher fight for him IMO.

No. There's a clear difference in the standing of the fighters. I get it. You're one of "those guys" who has to pretend that every fight is the same so you can justify Rod Salkas and the like. "They all suck doe".

At this rate - i.e the rate of steadily increasing the level of your competition - he will be fine.

Disagree. Alexander is a cakewalk for Khan. Two boxers and Khan does everything better. Guerrero will put a lot of pressure on Khan and we haven't seen him in that kind of fight since PEDerson.

[IronDanHamza]

No. There's a clear difference in the standing of the fighters. I get it. You're one of "those guys" who has to pretend that every fight is the same so you can justify Rod Salkas and the like. "They all suck doe".

At this rate - i.e the rate of steadily increasing the level of your competition - he will be fine.

Disagree. Alexander is a cakewalk for Khan. Two boxers and Khan does everything better. Guerrero will put a lot of pressure on Khan and we haven't seen him in that kind of fight since PEDerson.

Both are stylistically easy fights for Khan IMO but good fights none the less.

[IMDAZED]

No. There's a clear difference in the standing of the fighters. I get it. You're one of "those guys" who has to pretend that every fight is the same so you can justify Rod Salkas and the like. "They all suck doe".

At this rate - i.e the rate of steadily increasing the level of your competition - he will be fine.

Disagree. Alexander is a cakewalk for Khan. Two boxers and Khan does everything better. Guerrero will put a lot of pressure on Khan and we haven't seen him in that kind of fight since PEDerson.

Have never justified Salka, try again doe.

Whether there is a "clear" difference or not, they aren't very good. I'm sorry you think they are. And like I said, at that rate he wouldn't fight an elite fighter in forever.

Alexander to me is a tougher fighter than Guerrero simply because, while hittable, he's a lot better defensively and much, much quicker on his feet. Plus, he's got faster hands, which gives him a better shot of actually catching Khan. Either way I'd pick Khan to beat both en route to getting KTFO the next time he steps up.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Have never justified Salka, try again doe.

Whether there is a "clear" difference or not, they aren't very good. I'm sorry you think they are. And like I said, at that rate he wouldn't fight an elite fighter in forever.
.

Molina - Bum, Diaz - gatekeeper, Collazo - veteran top 10 welterweight, Guerrero/Alexander/Brook - top 5/6 welterweight. Mayweather

[IMDAZED]

Molina - Bum, Diaz - gatekeeper, Collazo - veteran top 10 welterweight, Guerrero/Alexander/Brook - top 5/6 welterweight. Mayweather

Aside from Collazo, those fights ****** going in. Whether one was on the bottom rung and the other on the second-to-bottom rung.

[djt117]

Aside from Collazo, those fights ****** going in. Whether one was on the bottom rung and the other on the second-to-bottom rung.

Porter (in many people's eyes) loses to Diaz, gets draw, no one really says much of anything because Porter was not a champion at the time; he was just a contender

Khan fights Diaz ("Khan's a cherry-picking p*ssy")

Thurman knocks out Diaz ("Khan's win is ****") ... really? Does Thurman's KO of Diaz not detract from Porter at all?

"No b/c at least Porter set things right in a rematch!"

Really? And what would all the Khan critics / haters have said if he rematched Diaz instead of fighting Collazo?!? ... ROFL

[FrankieBruno]

Porter (in many people's eyes) loses to Diaz, gets draw, no one really says much of anything because Porter was not a champion at the time; he was just a contender

Khan fights Diaz ("Khan's a cherry-picking p*ssy")

Thurman knocks out Diaz ("Khan's win is ****") ... really? Does Thurman's KO of Diaz not detract from Porter at all?

"No b/c at least Porter set things right in a rematch!"

Really? And what would all the Khan critics / haters have said if he rematched Diaz instead of fighting Collazo?!? ... ROFL

different rules for khan it seems

[ShoulderRoll]

I never pretend the business side doesn't exist.

But Adonis Stevenson is a ducker for chasing a money fight with Hopkins, right?

Dumbass hypocrite.