It is indeed, Pavlik is a very limited fighter that Hopkins was easily able to exploit.
Kovalev is a lot smarter of a fighter than Pavlik and it will show in November.
It is indeed, Pavlik is a very limited fighter that Hopkins was easily able to exploit.
Kovalev is a lot smarter of a fighter than Pavlik and it will show in November.
What're you guys talking about? Max was right in his final comment, nobody wins an interview with Hopkins, and it's not because he's a master debater, more so that he refutes any opinion which undermines his position and speaks endlessly.
Max is right - It is a fair assumption to assume that this 'could' be a difficult task to accomplish for Bernard, I don't see why that opinion deserves such a pessimistic refute from Hopkins. Is max supposed to just straight up say "Hopkins, everyone believes you're going to win, you're the best, Kovalev has no chance" and /bow infront of him?
Some posters are so ******, really.
Totally agree. Kellerman was honest and Hopkins was a bit defensive. Neither won a debate but It's how Hopkins riles himself mentally, so I get it.
I think it's more telling that B-Hop took over Kovalev's interview and made it his show. Kovalev seemed to be too respectful of B-Hop, should have given him a couple of seconds then told him to beat it! Kovalev was the victor and deserved to have the post fight spotlight to himself. B-Hop is a master at mind games and just gained a little bit of ground against Kovalev......
Good point. I also think hopkins needed to hear that adversity to get his own juices pumping.
Tweet
Comment