Official Tyson Fury vs Wladimir Klitschko Post Fight Discussion Thread

[Fury4daWIN]

The version is still better than the less skilled Chisora...wjhat you failed to realize Vitali made him look better than he actually was...injuries are a *****...however...Pumping up Chisora to make Fury look great is not going to work....AGAIN even a semi good Rahamn over shadows Chisora who was not really top 5 quality material...a good fighter but not relevant one..maybe when fury fought him but that doesnt change his actual status...you are becoming unglued my friend time to cash out as still one of the better posters on here! you cant make shyte into gold....Chisora not shining when he fought fury its real simple.

I'm not trying to make Fury look great. His achievements speak for themselves. Lest you forgot, he just beat Wladimir Klitschko, and made him look like total shyte as well. Is Rahman better than him too?

[juggernaut666]

I'm not trying to make Fury look great. His achievements speak for themselves. Lest you forgot, he just beat Wladimir Klitschko, and made him look like total shyte as well. Is Rahman better than him too?

I put fury over him...I have Fury my top 10 right NOW head to head...I just don't know where.as stated he has to fight top guys other than Wlad even in a loss......I think he beats most boxers that have laced them up...to me hes actually a bigger ali of sorts. I woul;d favor him over anyone pre 80's.

[Elroy1]

I also think (now) that Fury would be one of Wlad's top opponents and it's possible he could have beaten most or all of the others too. My point exactly is that it is laughably fast and a bit rich for Fury to go from being a bit of a joke and a "stay busy" type opponent for Wlad to being able to beat any version of Wlad and all of his opponents. Based on a single fight with Wlad in which he was victorious, in which Wlad seemed less than even a shadow and Fury HIMSELF did not even perform so well!

[juggernaut666]

I also think (now) that Fury would be one of Wlad's top opponents and it's possible he could have beaten most or all of the others too. My point exactly is that it is laughably fast and a bit rich for Fury to go from being a bit of a joke and a "stay busy" type opponent for Wlad to being able to beat any version of Wlad and all of his opponents. Based on a single fight with Wlad in which he was victorious, in which Wlad seemed less than even a shadow and Fury HIMSELF did not even perform so well!

Please go over my posts....did I make any mis posts or lopsided comparisons...maybe you could see them? I didn't? If anything I propped fury up and still they swarmed ..anything to discredit klitchko anything yet it also discredits Fury in return...do they not know what they post or reply too?.lol

[LacedUp]

Entereth another nut!

So let's get your official statement in too same as Bill..

From Peter, Chagaev, Rahman, Byrd, Chambers, Povetkin, Haye, Brock, Jennings, Ibragimov and on and on... Fury's lack lustre the other night convinced you he was better than all of these guys and the Wladimir that beat them all up also right?

And his 18 power punches and 40 odd jabs he threw the entire fight (that's 1 non jab every 2 minutes of fighting and only about 4 jabs a round) is wholly attributable to Fury's genius skills, which ALSO looked rather amateurish mind you as well, and not to Wladimir's faded efforts?

Again, just like Bill, you don't really believe this!

It is more psychological soil you choose to lay down. using the MYTH of a weak era, to discredit the greatest of all champs and promote your old favourite champs from times past and maybe some more recent ones (like Wilder maybe), who would be totally irrelevant without such myths.

Lol, listing those names just made your case worse

Absolute worst bummies of any heavyweights in any era! Imagine in the 90s those guys would have never been allowed to step into the ring with a champion, let alone be listed as good "wins"

Wlad proved that when faced with a real man, he caved in and showed his true colours. And it proved he was a sissy just as expected all along.

He probably deserves to be somewhere around #15 of all times, not higher!

FACT!

[LacedUp]

I wouldn't rush ahead and write Wlad off just yet, a rematch is coming. We'll see what he's made of when he has nothing to lose.

Yeah and when he loses that, what will your excuse be then?

[MisterPullman]

Yeah and when he loses that, what will your excuse be then?

It is what it is.

Wlad is getting old and Fury was his kryptonite

[juggernaut666]

Yeah and when he loses that, what will your excuse be then?

There will be no excuse based on his punch count if tallied up to some reasonable one...or taking that out of play if he gets k.o'd early....the bigger question is how you have green added to you...must be the one sided Tyson fans who TRY and discredit Wlad...at the same time discredit fury? But according to you Wlad only won ...ONe round correct?

[LacedUp]

There will be no excuse based on his punch count if tallied up to some reasonable one...or taking that out of play if he gets k.o'd early....the bigger question is how you have green added to you...must be the one sided Tyson fans who TRY and discredit Wlad...at the same time discredit fury? But according to you Wlad only won ...ONe round correct?

I watched it back the other day and couldn't possibly give Wlad more than 1 round firmly. 8 I believe it was. 12 was even and 9 was even seeing as the point was deducted from Fury, but he clearly won the round and did so on every judge's scorecard.

Face it, Wlad was scared to death of the real man and in turn threw numbers David Haye would look at in disgust.

[Elroy1]

So Chisora wasn't even as good as the Rahman who fought Povetkin? Just give up mate, you're chatting shit.




Ugh, are you functionally dim? We're not talking about prime Rahman you dope, we're talking about the walking punchbag that Wlad fought. Do you understand that those versions of the fighters are not the same as each other?

So yes, you do need a breakdown, taking into account Rahman's rapid decline following the days when he could actually pull the trigger.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XaIkfFY8cmE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGHC989mRvE

Rahman didin't look too bad to me..

Ironically Rahman was the same age as Wlad is now when he fought Povetkin and YOUNGER than Wlad is now when he fought him!

Yet Wladimir at age 40 has NO excuse to be shot at all but Rahman was way to past it to box at that age.

Face it idiot, if current fighters like Wlad and Povetkin are so inferior then a 90's HW like Rahman should be able to trounce them even at 40.