-
-
No. You tried to act like you knew who Andrade was because he called out Canelo. So instead of watching his fights and doing your research you BoxRec'd him in an attempt to expose him. And you failed.
And now since you got your feelings hurt your bringing it up in every thread trying to save face. That's just something a casual fan would do.
Go away troll. Stop following me.Comment
-
Exactly. Canelos only impressive with guys who don't move, I don't see any improvement in Canelo since Trout.
Instead of silencing the critics, we are going to keep an eye on Canelo even closer now. Either he needs a new trainer or he really doesn't know how to cut off a ring.
If Molina and Angulo can do it, no reason why Canelo shouldn'tComment
-
LOL we got miss cleo in the house now? This mothafcka is making shiet up along as he goes. I knew who "boo boo" was because he runs his mouth, this is the guy that thinks he has the "perfect style" for mayweather.
The only thing you exposed is your mediocrity when it comes to debating.Comment
-
Well clean victories or not he knocked off 2 of the most feared JMW within his last 4 fights. He sought after the fights his own promoter and team told him not to, that alone says a lot about a fighter. That means he really is trying to challenge himself and by doing so proving to the nay sayers that he can handle his own. Perhaps he isn't the most effective when fighting slick fighters but who else looks stupendous against them?
Canelo doesn't smother or clench, can't cut the ring off efficiently and doesn't get into fire fights often unless he is confident he will come out on top. What he can do he does it well and that is counterpunching and combinations. That's why the saying remains true especially in Canelo's last few outings aside from Angulo, Styles make fights.
I believe Canelo is similar to Juan Manuel Marquez in the sense that both look amazing against come forward fighters who brawl, yet both look subpar against moving boxers who aren't as offensively minded. The Marquez you saw in the Bradley fight didn't look as crisp and powerful as in the Alvarado schooling because of the style clashes. A counter punching boxer won't look good against a pure boxer, a pure boxer is troubled by a pressure fighter, a pressure fighter is often stopped by countering combination boxer, etc..
Canelo is great at what he does and decent enough at what he doesn't, enough to screech by. He just needs to stick to his style and exploit it.Comment
-
You're trying to make me commit to a specific boxer so you can jump on me and tell me how the guy is not a mover and a pot-shotter. My point was that whoever would be a bad match up for Canelo and exploit him on some way, is what you guys want to see (not necessarily YOU) so you can get your rocks off (once again, not necessarily YOU.) From my very first post it was a general statement, so GTFOH with that shieetttt!Comment
-
And your're wrong. People want to see the best fight the best. And Lara and Trout were he best fights to be made at 154. Nothing more. You made this thread with Andrade in mind but Andrade stands in the pocket and is a solid combination puncher.
And nobody wants to see Canelo vs. Andrade yet because Andrade hasn't beat anybody in the top 5 yet.
It's like you guys are *****ing because we want to see Canelo fight the best fighters instead of his division instead of beating up on irrelevant hopeless punching bags like James Kirkland.Comment
Tweet
Get real dude
Comment