Canelo, the critics, the failure to realize:

[Weebler I]

Who are these people? People wanted to see Canelo vs. Trout because Trout earned it by beating Cotto. People wanted to see Canelo vs. Lara because Lara earned it by beating Trout and Angulo. It has nothing to do with their styles.

What has Kirkland done to earn his shot besides sit on his ass, criticize his trainer and ***** about boxing politics?

If you want these action fighters to get big opportunities then they need to earn it just like everybody else does.

Since when did anyone have to earn a shot at Canelo? he's not even a champion and arguably lost three of his last four fights. It's not much different to earning a shot at Chavez Jr and no one ever says that.

The guy doesn't even fight in his supposed weight class.

[MrRolltide91]

canelo is iight

[Erislandy lara]

i hate when people say I am "insert nationality here " in order to validate their score.

anyway respect canelo's ambition to take on all fighters

probably needs a new trainer

and lara didnt throw enough because he didnt want to risk getting caught, otherwise he would've fought more like he did against angulo and trout.

The only reason canelo takes on anyone is because he knows his daddy oscar bought him the judges already

[Resilient]

Since when did anyone have to earn a shot at Canelo? he's not even a champion and arguably lost three of his last four fights. It's not much different to earning a shot at Chavez Jr and no one ever says that.

The guy doesn't even fight in his supposed weight class.

Anything to discredit Floyd eh lmao.

[Weebler I]

Anything to discredit Floyd eh lmao.

No, I give Canelo credit. Personally, I thought he beat Lara and Trout.

Where I take issue is the notion that anyone has to "earn" the right to fight him, particularly not those who have been doing it a lot longer and been winning more convincingly.

Trout was more proven when he fought Canelo, he didn't have to earn it. Same goes for Lara, and the same goes for Carlos Molina and to Kirkland. Canelo is not above these guys, he's the same level, if not slightly below due to inexperience.

[Resilient]

No, I give Canelo credit. Personally, I thought he beat Lara and Trout.

Where I take issue is the notion that anyone has to "earn" the right to fight him, particularly not those who have been doing it a lot longer and been winning more convincingly.

Trout was more proven when he fought Canelo, he didn't have to earn it. Same goes for Lara, and the same goes for Carlos Molina and to Kirkland.

Well. They do.

Canelo is the future cash cow and the fighter of choice if a guy wants that payday, so there is a long queue for guys who wanna fight him, so you do have to do something to ''earn'' that fight.

[Weebler I]

Well. They do.

Canelo is the future cash cow and the fighter of choice if a guy wants that payday, so there is a long queue for guys who wanna fight him, so you do have to do something to ''earn'' that fight.

So does Andre Ward, Carl Froch, Sakio Bika and Arthur Abraham have to earn a shot at Chavez Jr?

It's the same principle, these guys are already at the same level or actually above Chavez despite his greater marketability.

They don't have to earn anything.

[Resilient]

So does Andre Ward, Carl Froch, Sakio Bika and Arthur Abraham have to earn a shot at Chavez Jr?

It's the same principle, these guys are already at the same level or actually above Chavez despite his greater marketability.

They don't have to earn anything.

Yes they do.

[BendOver]

Canelo needs work and i think he will get better, hes young and has time to improve, if he doesnt improve he will lose eventually and soon, thing thats good about him is this... he is fighting top competition

he is not going to improve, he is 24 years old but has being fighting for almost 10 years and he hasn't learn by now,