It's only "controversial" because the fight was that close... So blame Lara for not doing enough.. you can't blame Canelo because A. He won on the judges score cards period. B. he was coming forward all night.. If he was missing all night, it's because someone was running away. Not because lara had good defense at blocking shots. If Bradley vs. Pacquiao 1 was not a robbery or overturned then this fight is definitely nothing but a Cuban crying because he will NEVER get another shot.
PW, Molina, Vanes, Canelo, all have had controversy mostly because Lara refuses to engage in exchanges, he basically jabs just to appear busy, then throws counters when he has a chance, but if you don't put him in against a guy that comes forward he will put you to sleep with boredom just like he did vs Vanes and Molina. He basically confuses everyone the way he talks crap about his opponents then once the bell rings he refuses to exchange even the judges get confused
It was a close fight, if you guys can't realize that, you're delusional. That one socrecard was bogus, but we have in the same breath people on here saying Lara won 9-3 or 8-4....those are just as ridiculous as Canelo winning by that margin.
Lara lost a close fight, he has only himself to blame.
Comment