No way he won tonight and many had Trout beating him.
Canelos a mediocre fighter. True "hypejob," IMO
Collapse
-
-
That is absolute nonsense!
If his career has been carefully picked why has he fought some of the best fighters of our era?
Unjustified criticism, you will always get critics but you have no room for that sort of BS imo.Comment
-
Hype. He's just not that good, and imo there's nothing special about his style.
Canelo didn't beat Lara... He's just loved by the judges.Comment
-
He's a good but not great fighter he was given hype but a lot of fighters are and he's done admirably.Comment
-
I wouldn't say he's a hypejob but he has been getting some favorable scores in his recent fights. Eventually, that will catch up to him especially, if he is truly dominated in a fight and some how the judges side with him. I know he's being called the next big thing but I'm still waiting to see it.
On the other hand, there is no way he could have looked good last night. Lara fought the only way he could have fought to get a victory (moving alot). It certainly didn't look good with the big swinging misses Canelo had last night.Comment
-
Comment
-
As bad as you think 160 is...... I don't think either of these guys could beat Geale or Murray
Yet alone Golovkin.
Who cares who GGG has fought? He beats anyone at 160. anyone
But what's that got to do with anything? LolComment
Comment