Is Al Haymon's INVOLVEMENT IN BOXING a GOOD or BAD Thing?
Collapse
-
He's good for boxing. Let me explain why.
Posters on NSB post freequently that floyd and broner are bad for boxing because they are uneducated and spend too much time hogging the spotlight and talking about themselves.
Haymon is educated, and doesn't say anything. SInce he is the complete opposite of floyd and broner-who are bad for boxing-he, therfore is good for boxing.Comment
-
hes the new power, the new empire so to speak. i must admit im intrigued to see where hes taking the sport. one thing i will say is hes good for the fighters that work for him apparently. as far as how bad he is, not sure. hes given us some horrible fights but he's also produced some gems. the book is still open on what his involvement means for the sportComment
-
jesus christ, are you in 3rd grade or a old computer from halt and catch fire?
wtf is wrong with you?Comment
-
Is he a good thing or bad thing for boxing?
Yes, he is bad.
No, he is bad.
Yes, he is good.
No, he is not bad he is good.
I think the variation in answers can't be summed up to a yes or no poll due to the confusion in voting. I believe that's why people don't find it as straight forward as you.Comment
-
I get what you're saying but you ****ed up the answers!
You obvioisly dont get it. I know wtf hes trying to say. And btw the bold is definitely NOT what he said.
Tase about to pop a blood vessel.
Comment

Comment