Is Al Haymon's INVOLVEMENT IN BOXING a GOOD or BAD Thing?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The Tase
    NSB War Veteran
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Apr 2010
    • 4881
    • 760
    • 646
    • 14,229

    #1

    Is Al Haymon's INVOLVEMENT IN BOXING a GOOD or BAD Thing?

    Simple question.

    Is his involvement in boxing a good or bad thing for the sport?

    Ive already given my opinion and risked my life exposing the truth about this crime lord on the what is al haymon planning thread

    Poll to come.

    Discuss....
    26
    Yes
    30.77%
    8
    NO
    69.23%
    18
    Last edited by The Tase; 07-07-2014, 01:07 PM.
  • .:: JSFD26 ::.
    Brawski
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Mar 2012
    • 33329
    • 725
    • 432
    • 44,762

    #2
    Your poll answers do not make sense when considering your question. Wth am I saying yes or no to? If I say yes then what, yes good or yes bad? Same goes for answering No.

    Comment

    • Chiboxing123
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Apr 2012
      • 3059
      • 110
      • 42
      • 9,620

      #3
      Poll is misleading. But its a bad thing

      Comment

      • Masters01
        Banned
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Jun 2014
        • 692
        • 40
        • 52
        • 772

        #4
        Thing is, its tempting to say he's bad for the sport because of all the fights that do not happen, and he's definitely bad for the sport in the short term. But im looking forward to a time when boxing can become controlled by one entity, so that hopefully that entity can take more control away from the fighters (ala the UFC in MMA), which could enable us to see more of the fights we want to see. All this heavy competition brought about by having multiple big boxing promoters incentivises them all to stay competitive by offering more money and freedom to the fighters, and protecting them more.

        So, Haymon is showing promise that he can be the man to take full control of boxing from a promoters standpoint, and it could offer some good possibilities. Alternatively, Haymon might be the guy who wants to build and build his stars rather than taking the best fights as and when the fans want them.

        Comment

        • Accountoffline
          Accounthacked
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • May 2013
          • 3474
          • 142
          • 139
          • 10,183

          #5
          only time will tell, atm he is borderline knobhead and ******lover

          Comment

          • The Tase
            NSB War Veteran
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Apr 2010
            • 4881
            • 760
            • 646
            • 14,229

            #6
            Originally posted by .:: JSFD26 ::.
            Your poll answers do not make sense when considering your question. Wth am I saying yes or no to? If I say yes then what, yes good or yes bad? Same goes for answering No.
            Originally posted by chibox123
            Poll is misleading. But its a bad thing
            i cant edit my title but i edited the opening post.

            is his involvement in boxing a good or bad thing for the sport?

            Comment

            • VG_Addict
              king meat's twin
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jun 2012
              • 5618
              • 237
              • 3
              • 53,380

              #7
              WTF is up with the poll choices? How am I supposed to know which one means "Good" and which one means "Bad"?

              This isn't a yes or no question.

              Maybe you could change the question to, "Is Al Haymon's involvement in boxing good?", then have the choices be "Yes" or "No".

              Comment

              • Evol
                Floyd beats Pac
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • May 2012
                • 10357
                • 242
                • 18
                • 17,030

                #8
                Originally posted by .:: JSFD26 ::.
                Your poll answers do not make sense when considering your question. Wth am I saying yes or no to? If I say yes then what, yes good or yes bad? Same goes for answering No.
                it says right there, is his involvement in boxing good or no. so yes or no. pretty simple.

                Comment

                • -PBP-
                  32 Time World Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jan 2012
                  • 24107
                  • 836
                  • 635
                  • 34,297

                  #9
                  My answer is neither. He's just the new guy with power and is just as corrupt as the rest of them. But as long as he can get boxing on TV he's cool with me.

                  Comment

                  • hectari
                    Power to the People
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jan 2005
                    • 22896
                    • 1,430
                    • 768
                    • 131,802

                    #10
                    The poll needs to be fixed

                    Is Al Haymon's INVOLVEMENT IN BOXING a GOOD or BAD Thing?

                    but you only put yes or no.

                    It should be yes its a good thing or no its a bad thing.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP