Originally posted by MDPopescu
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who won Provodnikov vs Algieri?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by daggum View Postanyone who had algieri winning better never complain about pac-marquez 3 being a robbery. pac outlanded marquez by far in that fight but marquez landed the more eye-catching shots. i'm sure some of you will come up with another way to contradict yourself. should be fun. looking forward to it.
[IMG]
[/IMG]CompuBox numbers: Provodnikov 205 of 776 (26 percent). Algieri 288 of 993 (29 percent).
— ESPN Boxing (@ESPNBoxing) June 15, 2014
Comment
-
Originally posted by {Darko} View Postfor everyone talking about provo being badly outlanded and outhustled the numbers were far closer than they would like to make you think
[IMG]
[/IMG]CompuBox numbers: Provodnikov 205 of 776 (26 percent). Algieri 288 of 993 (29 percent).
— ESPN Boxing (@ESPNBoxing) June 15, 2014
Comment
-
Algieri won it in my eyes, and in doing so he got a new fan...I like his completely unorthodox and athletic style. Great conditioning and he seems so calm in the face of such a beast
I'd like to see him against more brawlers
Comment
-
I had it the same as the judges who had Algieri winning the fight:
114-112
Provo won 4 rounds, and one of those was a 10-7. The rest of the fight was clearly won and even dominated by Algieri. In fact, even the first round would have been an Algieri round without the knockdowns.
The truth is, this wasn't really a close fight. Without those two knockdowns in the first round, Algieri wins 117-109.
I kept telling my daughter, "these analysts are missing this fight, which is playing out just like Ali-Frazier"
Comment
-
LOL @ the notion of Algieri winning the fight. Clearly clean punching, effective aggressiveness, and ring generalship are no longer a criteria when scoring a fight. It's come down to if you land more punches, no matter how soft they may be, you win. It's back to the amateur scoring criteria we go.
Comment
-
Originally posted by badass316 View PostLOL @ the notion of Algieri winning the fight. Clearly clean punching, effective aggressiveness, and ring generalship are no longer a criteria when scoring a fight. It's come down to if you land more punches, no matter how soft they may be, you win. It's back to the amateur scoring criteria we go.
Comment
-
Originally posted by badass316 View PostLOL @ the notion of Algieri winning the fight. Clearly clean punching, effective aggressiveness, and ring generalship are no longer a criteria when scoring a fight. It's come down to if you land more punches, no matter how soft they may be, you win. It's back to the amateur scoring criteria we go.
I swear people watch fights and just score like
1. Ruslan punch hard doe
2 Ruslan punch hard doe
3 Ruslan punch hard doe
4 Ruslan punch hard doe
And then wonder why their 117-109 cards are flat out ridiculous
Comment
Comment