Did Cotto surpass Mayweather with Martinez win

[Kuyukut]

without a doubt, cotto fought and convincingly out-classed a real champion. a champion fraud would never even imagine of considering as an opponent.

respect...

[SeekDaGreat]

I say no. And I'm a big Cotto fan.

[jayjames616]

I honestly don't understand some of you guys. How can you possibly ask this question and be serious?

[jayjames616]

without a doubt, cotto fought and convincingly out-classed a real champion. a champion fraud would never even imagine of considering as an opponent.

respect...

Is Cotto not considered a real champion? If im not mistaken he was thee champion when "Fraud" moved up in weight and took his title.

[Larry the boss]

Is a win over Martinez better then a win over Cotto?

[Edmond Dantes]

Cotto started at 140, Mayweather at 130. Mayweather's beaten better quality opponents over the course of his career, all the while being undefeated. Can't say the same for Cotto, who's apparent best win is over a 39 year old past prime fighter coming off a 14 month lay off and frequent surgeries.

[Edmond Dantes]

Is a win over Martinez better then a win over Cotto?

Here's a nice serving of ether for the folks on this thread.

[Kagami Taiga]

Look at it this way. Floyds win over mosely is nearly exactly similar to Cotto's win over Sergio. The only differences being it was Cottos first fight at that weight and Shane was coming off a career highlight while Sergio was coming off a fight he looked horrible in. But yet ppl rate them very differently. It's kinda odd.

[Showtime..]

Cottards doing anything they can to try and get a Floyd rematch. Imagine if they brought out Cotto > Pacquiao All Time. Delusional bunch

[fvanesbeck]

Purely in terms of opponents faced you'd have to say Cotto. But Mayweather is clearly a more accomplished boxer, with a better skillset.