How is Mayweather beating GGG a better win than beating Cotto at MW?
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Would Mayweather be the favorite over Cotto in a rematch bro? The eye test shows me that Mayweather is light years better than GGG could ever hope to be.And more proven by a mile.because ggg would be favourite to beat cotto
i think ggg is the best mw on the planet
resume and ability are different things
i and many of my fellow posters are intelligent enough to use the eye test and see that ggg would beat cotto at mw and he beats mayweather at mw alsoLast edited by B.U.R.N.E.R; 06-10-2014, 05:27 PM.Comment
-
Comment
-
I think if GGG beat that Martinez, and in a more spectacular fashion, people wouldn't have given him as much credit as they are with Cotto. That's what I'm getting out of it, whether it might've been true or not.Comment
-
It's illegitimate because Cotto isn't a middleweight and he won the title at a catchweight. He'd never done a single thing in the division prior, he just walked right into a title shot in a division he'd never fought in at a catchweight with an aging champion who'd been injured and inactive for over a year.
As for Golovkin being a legitimate champion - He's been the WBA champ since 2010, so you must not be paying attention.Comment
-
It's not that it would be more legit, but some people say GGG isn't the best MW because Sergio is the man of the division, but Sergios team doesn't want the fight yet people still discredit GGG yet he get the shot to prove himself? Now that Cotto has the belt is he going to fight GGG? This the MW division either you fight the best in your division or you relinquish the belt. I don't wanna see Cotto fighting a WW or JMW at catch weight for the Lineal MW title, when GGG has been the #2 behind Sergio for the longest not getting his shot.Comment
-
So the Nilson Julio Tapia fight made GGG a legit MW champion.
But Cotto beating the Lineal MW champion of the world in spectacluar fashion doesnt make him a legit MW champion.
Interesting.Last edited by B.U.R.N.E.R; 06-10-2014, 05:54 PM.Comment
Comment