How is Mayweather beating GGG a better win than beating Cotto at MW?

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

its safe to say GGG would decimate Cotto regardless of how he has fought in the past ... therefore he would be a better opponent for mayweather but that fight would never happen that would be the check money couldnt cash and he is looking to retire undefeated and he isnt going to fight anyone that has a serious potential to take that away from him ... he learned that when he fought Maidana

Why is it safe to say that?


And what did Floyd learn from Maidana? A guy he easily beat and might fight again?

[Pugilist95]

Why is it safe to say that?


And what did Floyd learn from Maidana? A guy he easily beat and might fight again?

He didn't beat Maidana easily.

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

He didn't beat Maidana easily.

Mehhh...had it 117-111, 116-112 for Floyd at the worst. It was an easy win. Yeah Maidana did a lot of dirty shyt but that didnt make the fight harder for Floyd just made it uglier and you people confused it with being tougher because you arent used to seeing him in "ugly" fights.

It was an easy clear cut win. Easy ass rematch too.

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

Because people love to hype up untested KO artists.

While Golovkin is winning "Who would win" polls vs Froch, Kessler and is able to duck Ward; Cotto has actually won real fights.

This this and this.

[In Motion]

Solid bump. Garbageovkin is nothing to brag about. Let's wait until this guy gets a decent with against a decent MW for once before he's hyped to oblivion.

[Porter's Dad]

Is the thread title question for real?

[hugh grant]

How is beating GGG a better win than beating Cotto?

Cotto is a much better fighter than Golovkin.
Cotto has accomplished more in the sport than GGG ever will.
Cottos resumes isnt even on the same planet as GGG's.
Cotto is the Lineal MW Champion of the World.

What has GGG ever done to be considered a good win? Speak broken english and knock out nobodies? And this is from a guy who enjoys watching him fight and anticipates his next scrap. But lets be serious here for a minute.

Now on the flip side for Cotto:

How is beating GGG a better win than beating Mayweather?

Mayweather is a much better fighter than Golovkin.
Mayweather has accomplished more in the sport than GGG ever will.
Mayweather's resumes isnt even on the same planet as GGG's.
Mayweather is the King of the JMW Division and the WW Division.


Cmon NSB get your shyt together.

GGG beat the man who beat Sergio, ie Martin Murray
GGG is feared and avoided
GGG is more feared than Floyd. Everybody wants to beat Floyd and everyone thinks they can.

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

Is the thread title question for real?

:burner::burner::burner:

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

GGG beat the man who beat Sergio, ie Martin Murray
GGG is feared and avoided
GGG is more feared than Floyd. Everybody wants to beat Floyd and everyone thinks they can.

[RetroSpeed05]

Did Cotto just beat the lineal MW champion of the world or nah?

Ive still yet to see any good reason why GGG is a good win for Floyd or Cotto.
So far I have "he has a good am back ground" and that hes "undefeated" yet he has a horrible resume.

Any more takers on the question?

The same Lineal champ that ducked GGG to fight a blown up WW in Cotto? Cotto is lucky to be Lineal champ, DiBella said himself no point in fighting a monster like GGG when Cotto's brings more $$$.