Why Lemieux vs Quillin?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dan_cov
    Zombie Taylor
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jun 2011
    • 24567
    • 3,225
    • 3,275
    • 145,001

    #11
    Originally posted by 285Kid
    What you mean why he just won the WBO/NABO belt he pretty much now in line for Kid Chocolate world title belt

    Oh I see. I thought Jacobs was mandatory.
    I can never keep up with these belts & who is mandatory etc, does my head in.

    Comment

    • Evil Abed
      The Darkest Timeline...
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Nov 2009
      • 21964
      • 979
      • 1,320
      • 30,552

      #12
      David Lemieux in on Curtis Stevens level. So it's not much of change from GGG's recent opposition.

      Geale is a top MW.

      Comment

      • VatoMulatto
        Banned
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Nov 2003
        • 8168
        • 289
        • 218
        • 104,445

        #13
        People just don't like Quillin and want to see him get KO'd. If they ever fight and Quillin beats him the same people will tell you that Lemieux wasn't any good to begin with and Quillin needs to step up and fight someone.

        Comment

        • Larry the boss
          EDUCATED
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jan 2011
          • 90798
          • 6,419
          • 4,473
          • 2,500,480

          #14
          Showtime-HBO man..come on

          Comment

          • Fetta
            nob cheese
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jan 2011
            • 16696
            • 417
            • 3
            • 24,315

            #15
            Originally posted by dan_cov
            Oh I see. I thought Jacobs was mandatory.
            I can never keep up with these belts & who is mandatory etc, does my head in.
            I thought I heard Jim ask if he wanted to fight winner of Jacobs v chocolate.

            Is there any truth that this fight is in works? Anyone know or gear that too?

            Comment

            • Mikhnienko
              Lomachenko P4P#1
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • May 2009
              • 6056
              • 413
              • 473
              • 13,966

              #16
              Originally posted by Evil Abed
              David Lemieux in on Curtis Stevens level. So it's not much of change from GGG's recent opposition.

              Geale is a top MW.
              Macklin and Stevens are two guys Kid Undercard could have fought but didn't. He's using the if the money is right excuse for Danny Jacobs and will do the same for Lemieux. It would be more fun to see Lemieux knock Kid out then unify with Golovkin but we all know Quillin is the official babysitter for that WBO belt until Canelo moves up. TS is dumb.

              Comment

              • dan_cov
                Zombie Taylor
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jun 2011
                • 24567
                • 3,225
                • 3,275
                • 145,001

                #17
                Originally posted by Evil Abed
                David Lemieux in on Curtis Stevens level. So it's not much of change from GGG's recent opposition.

                Geale is a top MW.

                I think he is far better than Stevens certainly a lot riskier fight due to his power.
                Stevens is a good puncher but Lemieux is a devastating puncher.

                He is strong, seems durable and can hit like a truck. I think their styles would provide a belter for as long as it lasted. Neither guys taking a backwards step.

                Geale is quite skilled he just hasn't the power & his chin is very shaky to say the least. He may look good for a few rounds with his in-out jerky style but GGG is going to hit him at some point.

                I just can't get excited for that fight, GGG is going to brutalise Geale. I'd be very surprised if Geale made it past 3 or 4.

                Comment

                • Foreign Soil
                  First Time Skeptic
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jul 2013
                  • 5249
                  • 194
                  • 219
                  • 11,783

                  #18
                  Is this your first Lemieux fight? The guy isn't good at all. All he has is early fight power and Guerrero has a notorious horrible chin. People saying Lemieux vs Quillin are only recognizing that Quillin isn't that good himself.

                  And LOL - Geale's chin is less sturdy than Lemieux'??? This has to be your first Lemieux fight.

                  Comment

                  • Russian Crushin
                    atheist with a gun
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Dec 2009
                    • 33788
                    • 1,471
                    • 836
                    • 46,625

                    #19
                    Originally posted by dan_cov
                    I think he is far better than Stevens certainly a lot riskier fight due to his power.
                    Stevens is a good puncher but Lemieux is a devastating puncher.

                    He is strong, seems durable and can hit like a truck. I think their styles would provide a belter for as long as it lasted. Neither guys taking a backwards step.

                    Geale is quite skilled he just hasn't the power & his chin is very shaky to say the least. He may look good for a few rounds with his in-out jerky style but GGG is going to hit him at some point.

                    I just can't get excited for that fight, GGG is going to brutalise Geale. I'd be very surprised if Geale made it past 3 or 4.
                    Golovkin would brutalize Lemieux even faster. The guy is the ortiz of 160 but without any decent wins. He hates getting hit and after 6 rounds and punching himself out, he will easily fold.

                    Its hard to get the alcine fight out my mind, he got outboxed by alcine and his "devastating'' power didnt help him out

                    Comment

                    • Evil Abed
                      The Darkest Timeline...
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Nov 2009
                      • 21964
                      • 979
                      • 1,320
                      • 30,552

                      #20
                      Originally posted by dan_cov
                      I think he is far better than Stevens certainly a lot riskier fight due to his power.
                      Stevens is a good puncher but Lemieux is a devastating puncher.

                      He is strong, seems durable and can hit like a truck. I think their styles would provide a belter for as long as it lasted. Neither guys taking a backwards step.

                      Geale is quite skilled he just hasn't the power & his chin is very shaky to say the least. He may look good for a few rounds with his in-out jerky style but GGG is going to hit him at some point.

                      I just can't get excited for that fight, GGG is going to brutalise Geale. I'd be very surprised if Geale made it past 3 or 4.
                      Macklin destroyed Alcine in one round after Alcine beat Lemieux.

                      I think the power is nearly identical with Stevens. Styles are a lot differernt.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP