hbo dominated the ratings because they have a bigger subscription base. but if u do averages showtimes average viewership was higher. and showtime has also increased their subscription numbers at a higher rate while HBO's was more flat. thats all to say, while your numbers are correct, they are also skewed. showtime made tremendous strides in the last year or so.
Showtimes not focusing on profit with Mayweather.
Collapse
-
-
Hopkins was doing 1 mil with HBO, less than 700 K with Showtime.
I mean you have GBP fighters competing for dates in Showtime with less subscribers, where the money is pretty much in the Mayweather pot.
I think GBP messed up, they lost HBO viewership and money.
I don't understand why anyone would want to jump and compete with GBP fighters, when HBO has the money and the viewers.Comment
-
they are competing for dates? with who??? there is no competing. i think thats the point gbp vs gbp is better gbp vs. top rank, dibella, main events, k2, goosen etc. besides, it was hbo that banished gbp, not the other way around.Hopkins was doing 1 mil with HBO, less than 700 K with Showtime.
I mean you have GBP fighters competing for dates in Showtime with less subscribers, where the money is pretty much in the Mayweather pot.
I think GBP messed up, they lost HBO viewership and money.
I don't understand why anyone would want to jump and compete with GBP fighters, when HBO has the money and the viewers.Comment
-
Chavez Jnr and Marquez just did 1.4mil and 1.3mil; while Hopkins and Thurman did less than 700K.hbo dominated the ratings because they have a bigger subscription base. but if u do averages showtimes average viewership was higher. and showtime has also increased their subscription numbers at a higher rate while HBO's was more flat. thats all to say, while your numbers are correct, they are also skewed. showtime made tremendous strides in the last year or so.
At the end of the day it's the pay of these fighters that going to drive them, and it's the viewers and ratings that's going to pay.
Whether it's HBO or Showtime, they're going to want the same pay.Comment
-
chavez jr. and marquez have bigger followings than hopkins. none of that is surprising. its really not fair to compare thurman at all honestly. broner regularly pulled over 1 mil on showtime. so did danny garcia. and once again, the numbers for HBO will be higher, because like i said before, they have the higher subscriber ship.Chavez Jnr and Marquez just did 1.4mil and 1.3mil; while Hopkins and Thurman did less than 700K.
At the end of the day it's the pay of these fighters that going to drive them, and it's the viewers and ratings that's going to pay.
Whether it's HBO or Showtime, they're going to want the same pay.Comment
-
Like I was saying in another thread. None of these guys were talking when HBO was paying huge purses annually for BOTH Manny Pacquaio and Floyd Mayweather at the same time. People weren't crying about how HBO was going to grow broke by having such a huge budget where most of it is being spent on the two most expensive professional boxers in history. No one was talking about HBO's profit or losses then.U ever heard the saying u gotta spend money to make money. Showtime is trying to expand their Sports empire and through it, their viewer base. They had to know Floyd wasn't gonna average 2mil ppvs every time out. They are not that ******. They did what they did to energize their base, and by all accounts it worked last year. This year still has half way to go, but they did not lose money last year. CBS did not lose money last year. They made gains in viewership, prescription and profit.
Comment
-
The idea that Showtime signed Mayweather in the belief that they were going to use him as a loss leader and not someone who would be profitable is possibly the daftest concept I've heard on here.
Comment
-
2 million? No.U ever heard the saying u gotta spend money to make money. Showtime is trying to expand their Sports empire and through it, their viewer base. They had to know Floyd wasn't gonna average 2mil ppvs every time out. They are not that ******. They did what they did to energize their base, and by all accounts it worked last year. This year still has half way to go, but they did not lose money last year. CBS did not lose money last year. They made gains in viewership, prescription and profit.
1 million? Hmm.Comment
-
Comment
-
I don't think ThePrince realizes what he's reading. Higher PPV costs has nothing to do with a loss.Comment
Comment