Its clear that you do not understand the topic you're attempting to debate.
If Haymon has contractual control over 80% of GBP fighters, how in the hell can ODLH mend relationships with Arum, when he doesn't have but a handful of assets?
Simple minds seemingly cannot grasp the concept, that boxer's don't care what banner is raised, as long as they get the best purse for their efforts. And at present guys associated with Haymon are getting the biggest purses.
So, ODLH mends his relationship with Arum ..... So what!!!
GBP has an almost empty stable!!!
ODLH cannot avoid dealing with Haymon ..... period!
Haymon is the one in control of the assets and the boxer's themselves like the job he's doing!!!
Its not the Promoter that is the asset, it is the boxer's themselves. And they are siding with Haymon.
Now, ignorant morons can spew nonsense endlessly on forums -- That's allowed. But at the very least, try to understand what is actually occurring before you reverberate practiced lines and regurgitated phrases trying to demonstrate an understanding that is evidently void of facts.
If Haymon has contractual control over 80% of GBP fighters, how in the hell can ODLH mend relationships with Arum, when he doesn't have but a handful of assets?
Simple minds seemingly cannot grasp the concept, that boxer's don't care what banner is raised, as long as they get the best purse for their efforts. And at present guys associated with Haymon are getting the biggest purses.
So, ODLH mends his relationship with Arum ..... So what!!!
GBP has an almost empty stable!!!
ODLH cannot avoid dealing with Haymon ..... period!
Haymon is the one in control of the assets and the boxer's themselves like the job he's doing!!!
Its not the Promoter that is the asset, it is the boxer's themselves. And they are siding with Haymon.
Now, ignorant morons can spew nonsense endlessly on forums -- That's allowed. But at the very least, try to understand what is actually occurring before you reverberate practiced lines and regurgitated phrases trying to demonstrate an understanding that is evidently void of facts.
Comment