Had Duran vs Barkley happened today; Had Duran been called "Su****ious"?
Collapse
-
-
On point. Internet logic:
My guy doesn't cheat. Only person in the world. Your guy uses PEDs when he wins but is off them when he loses.Comment
-
Duran didn't come out looking like this.The fight could have been in 1350s+, during the black plague. I asked if the fight happened today, would he be accused of using steroids.
My thread is not asking "Why didn't Duran get called a drug cheat for his Barkley win in the 1980s" which is what you are basically answering to.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
There should be no su****ion about JMM beating Alvarado.
They're not in the same league. Juan is head and shoulders above Mike.
The su****ion would be on JMM's body acne.Comment
-
Duran was kind of Blubbery when he fought Barkley so how would that raise su****ious ? Armstrong still went in light he didn't have a Money team that was all caught cheating so your answer is NO!Marquez is "su****ious" for beating Mike Alvarado by decision in his 4th weight class, who has lost to lesser fighters than Marquez like Rios and Provodnikov, and almost lost to Prescott. They were similar height, 2 inches apart, and similar size(4lbs apart). Both traded knock downs. But apparently Marquez is su****ious for his win.
So which wins of the past would have been called su****ious today? Would Duran vs Barkley be seen as su****ious? Would Henry Armstrong be accused of using PED's?Comment


Comment