Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Julio Cesar Chavez vs Floyd Mayweather

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by oldgringo
    Pernell had intangibles that Mayweather does not have. Strongest legs on a fighter I've seen around his weight, better defensively, craftier in general...

    Don't skew the punching difference either. Whitaker could turn it on when he wanted to...just look at what he did to Hurtado when he needed to really step up his game.
    Definately disagree. Sweet Pea was very crafty but Mayweather has all those moves with more snap. Intangibles? This kid has been fighting since birth has nothing but intangibles and Whitaker as crafty as he was....he couldn't fight in close like Mayweather can and was nowhere near the body puncher Floyd is. If Pea were fighting against corrales for example, he would beat him no doubt, but he wouldn't have broken him down the way Floyd did. This guy is a complete fighter...more complete than even Whitaker...and if you want to know how hard Pea hit, just check his knockout percentage.

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by DIEGO DA HITMAN
      Chavez did have some big wins, but it is a fact that he built that incredible winning streak fighting Tijuana taxi cab drivers. He should've fought the elite earlier in his career, instead of fighting bums, and he would've fared better against the elite.
      =======Results are not what matters dude.=========

      ** Results are that Floyd has 1 title win in 3 yrs and ain't fought a single elite in that period. Castillo gave him a scare, ya know? You on Depends yet?

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by boxing scribe
        Definately disagree. Sweet Pea was very crafty but Mayweather has all those moves with more snap. Intangibles? This kid has been fighting since birth has nothing but intangibles and Whitaker as crafty as he was....he couldn't fight in close like Mayweather can and was nowhere near the body puncher Floyd is. If Pea were fighting against corrales for example, he would beat him no doubt, but he wouldn't have broken him down the way Floyd did. This guy is a complete fighter...more complete than even Whitaker...and if you want to know how hard Pea hit, just check his knockout percentage.

        It's an entirely debatable subject, and points well taken, but I just haven't seen Mayweather on Pernells level yet.

        I agree with you that Mayweather is a more complete puncher more consistenly, but it seemed like you were trying to make Floyd out to be some big hitter in contrast with Pea.

        I wasn't trying to make it sound like Pernell was a big puncher, but he did have power...he just didn't usually sit down on his punches. He showed flashes of power early in his career...he knocked out what...13 of his first 24 opponents or something like that. He knocked Juan Nazario, a lightweight who had gone 16 rounds with Edwin Rosario clean out with 1 punch in a unified title fight. He came out and absolutely blitzed Hurtado, a natural welterweight in their championship bout. He dropped De La Hoya, etc etc...not a big puncher by any means, but showed he had some power occasionally.

        As for the other things, I have to disagree on Mayweather being as crafty as Whitaker, but there isn't much of a way to measure that.

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by JoartCC
          The fact is, Chavez got a bloated record fighting bums. WHen its high time to get it on with elites, he got his ass handed to him on a silver platter.
          Lordy Lordy... where do these people come from?

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by NAB
            Lordy Lordy... where do these people come from?
            somewhere from outerspace...

            planet "bias"?
            planet "dumb-++"?
            planet "I don't know jack about boxing"?
            planet "leave them alone they don't deseve answers"?

            I have no problem if someone tells me that he thinks floyd would beat chavez, 2 fights form now I might even agree. But saying chavez is an overrated bum who fought cabbies is just delusional.

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by NAB
              Lordy Lordy... where do these people come from?
              Actually, just look at your avatar and you'll see yourself that's where you come from.

              Rascist posts like these are funny.

              But then again, you don't have much of an argument or basis to argue that's why you resort to name-calling. Pathetic.

              Chavez is a bum who got his bloated records fighting cab drivers. When its time to face elites, he got his ass handed down to him.

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by wmute
                somewhere from outerspace...

                planet "bias"?
                planet "dumb-++"?
                planet "I don't know jack about boxing"?
                planet "leave them alone they don't deseve answers"?

                I have no problem if someone tells me that he thinks floyd would beat chavez, 2 fights form now I might even agree. But saying chavez is an overrated bum who fought cabbies is just delusional.
                Delusional? lol!

                The facts say otherwise.

                He got beat by elites. And he got beat bad. Real bad.

                That's all the facts you'll ever need.

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by JoartCC
                  Delusional? lol!

                  The facts say otherwise.

                  He got beat by elites. And he got beat bad. Real bad.

                  That's all the facts you'll ever need.
                  I am not debating with you, because you are not worth it, since you are not able to understand simple logical statements and I don' want to waste my time like I had to do in the duran thread, trying to explain a very simple concept in 12 ways and in 5 languages, until you left.

                  so go on, and consider as the only relevant facts your own biased selection. you are more than welcome

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by JoartCC
                    Actually, just look at your avatar and you'll see yourself that's where you come from.

                    Rascist posts like these are funny.

                    But then again, you don't have much of an argument or basis to argue that's why you resort to name-calling. Pathetic.

                    Chavez is a bum who got his bloated records fighting cab drivers. When its time to face elites, he got his ass handed down to him.
                    WTF???
                    Racist...
                    Name calling...

                    Chavez a 'bum'...

                    Nice one.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by JoartCC
                      Delusional? lol!

                      The facts say otherwise.

                      He got beat by elites. And he got beat bad. Real bad.

                      That's all the facts you'll ever need.
                      Have we met, by the way?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP