Comments Thread For: Rubin “Hurricane” Carter Passes Away at Age 76

[jbpanama]

No, I have not read it. While it may provide a small amount of insight into the nature of the case, Carter is clearly extremely biased and all of his opinions or assertions have to be very carefully considered because of this.

Instead of that, I'd rather rely on empirical evidence, all of which seems to suggest that Carter is guilty.

Small Amount of Insight...? How would U know, having not Read It???

[jbpanama]

Oh FFS. Did you know that Dylan won't even perform that song anymore after reviewing the case? It's clear that Carter was guilty.

Do U make this **** Up, Amigo???

[Jimmy Rustler]

Do U make this **** Up, Amigo???

No, I say it because it's true. He hasn't played it since the mid-70s.

Anyways, I'm done arguing. It's clear as day that Carter was guilty of triple-murder.

[JACK1190]

No, I say it because it's true. He hasn't played it since the mid-70s.

Anyways, I'm done arguing. It's clear as day that Carter was guilty of triple-murder.

I'd say the case for him being innocent is better than the case for him being guilty.

[jbpanama]

No, I say it because it's true. He hasn't played it since the mid-70s.

Anyways, I'm done arguing. It's clear as day that Carter was guilty of triple-murder.

Please give us a link, where Dylan Reviewed the Facts,
and Stopped Supporting Carter?

I suspect You Can't; so If your False in One, We can assume,
Most of your Dribble is False Nonsense too...

[Jimmy Rustler]

Please give us a link, where Dylan Reviewed the Facts,
and Stopped Supporting Carter?

I suspect You Can't; so If your False in One, We can assume,
Most of your Dribble is False Nonsense too...

It's semantics. Bob Dylan literally has no bearing on this case. What does matter is the facts, which I have tried to lay out in this thread. They are, to the best of my knowledge, true. You can choose to ignore them or interpret them however you please, but I firmly believe that Carter is a triple-murderer and I am not one bit sad that he is dead.

[jbpanama]

So, what you're saying is that I should agree and not challenge the argument that Carter himself made in his own book?

I'm using facts here, and you're just referencing them vaguely.

'And a lot of people, after looking at the TRUE FACTS , Agree!!!'

Yeah? Like what? As far as I can tell, I'm the only one bringing facts into this thread. I'd be more than open to hear some facts from proponents of Carter, as long as they are actually fact and not **** that Carter said in his book.

The Ax your Grinding, is not getting any Sharper....Officer.

[jbpanama]

It's semantics. Bob Dylan literally has no bearing on this case. What does matter is the facts, which I have tried to lay out in this thread. They are, to the best of my knowledge, true. You can choose to ignore them or interpret them however you please, but I firmly believe that Carter is a triple-murderer and I am not one bit sad that he is dead.

Hey Dumdo, Your Facts Are Shallow, as is your Research on the Subject...
You Stated that, Dylan reviewed the Facts, and Stopped supporting Carter.
Which is a BIG LIE...
Do U on Occasion tell the TRUTH???

[jbpanama]

Oh FFS. Did you know that Dylan won't even perform that song anymore after reviewing the case? It's clear that Carter was guilty.

After Reviewing the Case?
Where do U get these insights; or do U like Making **** Up???

The song Had no Relevance after the 70's, and Bob dosen't perform
many songs that He wrote...Like the Born Again Tunes from that
Period....Like "when U going to Wake Up?"...Huh JIMMY???

[GRUSTLER]

No, I have not read it. While it may provide a small amount of insight into the nature of the case, Carter is clearly extremely biased and all of his opinions or assertions have to be very carefully considered because of this.

Instead of that, I'd rather rely on empirical evidence, all of which seems to suggest that Carter is guilty.

Hold up! So you're on here talking all side ways about Rubin Carter and the case but you didn't even read the book or examine his side of the story? Innocent people get convicted of crimes they didn't do all the time. No matter what their past was. Dude could have been wrongly accused for this crime due to his past and history. You should know and have all the facts from both sides before talking about the situation like everything you are saying is a fact.