Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Tim Bradley DID NOT duck Khan.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by WilkinsOlajuwon View Post
    I see Khan funboys are still living in the past since that's all they can cling to.
    Bradley fan made the damn thread. We are just responding.

    Originally posted by WilkinsOlajuwon View Post
    Khanboys need to change their diapers.
    Sooooo he didnt duck Khan? Well im guessing Khan didnt duck Alexander either then right?
    Last edited by Box-Office; 04-11-2014, 05:17 PM.

    Comment


    • Khan TKO's Bradley within 3 rounds.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Anderson Silva View Post
        Khan TKO's Bradley within 3 rounds.

        Comment


        • People can bring race into it all they want, they can flash up Khan pictures all they want, it doesn't change the fact that Bradley admit ducking khan because he didn't want to lose.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View Post
            Just wanted to add some facts..

            Bradley called out Pac in 2009 when Pac was the Champion at 140lb..



            Now this happen while this had also happened within the same yr..

            What facts? So what is that suppose to mean? So what if he has called out Pacquiao before, Khan has done the same with Mayweather prior to this year. The facts are that there was an unofficial tournament going on where winners of Bradley-Alexander and Khan-Maidana would crown a Lineal 140lbs champion, so it was a fight public demanded and 140lbs was hot at the time, but Bradley decided to jump ship or should i say DUCKED.

            Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View Post
            We move on,Bradley had beat Abregu and Alexander had beat Kotelnik..Khan had beat Paulie M..After the fight(since we like to bring up the what if I lose comment)Khan clearly say's..I'll fight Maidana Bradley and Alexander can fight,then the winners will fight each other..He then turns around and fights Mccloskey..Where he came in from??Oh that's right,that fight came with a 3 fight deal..Meanwhile they expected Bradley to take a Khan fight with no insurances while Khan just got a 3 fight deal..
            It was after Bradley quacked out of the then career high Khan offer of $1.4 million is when Khan decided to take a tune up instead.

            Why did Bradley fight a shot Casamayor who was barely a shadow of his former self after ducking Khan? At least Mccloskey was an undefeated prospect at the time and young its another thing he turned out to be a bum, but at the time who would have known? Its like not giving Ortiz credit for Berto.

            Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View Post
            It's clear that TR offered Bradley more then one fight..While Shaw and GBP did not..It's clear he was on the top of the list(being Cotto said he would not fight Pac again,and Pac did not wanna fight Marquez again)to fight Pac..It's clear Bob had showed interest in Bradley before signing him and said as much..
            Which all still doesnt change jack about the fact when both Khan and Bradley were an inevitable match at 140lbs it was Bradley who quacked out.

            Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View Post
            It's clearly not a duck,and why no mention of Khan fighting Mccloskey instead of doing what he said he'd do??Oh and the suppose Mayweather fight,if Khan could have fought Mayweather what happened??Why did that fight not go down yet??Oh that's right the set backs..Losing to Peterson(who Bradley dominated btw)and getting his lights turned out by Garcia..Two fighters everyone and their mothers said was not even in Khans class(some of those same posters I see in this thread funny)..
            You are clearly unsure about what is a duck because what Bradley did isnt a duck then please do tell us what is? I hope your example isn't Stevenson-Kovalev cuz that will really debunk your own argument of "Business move".

            Peterson was on PEDs, but hey thats all good right. Plus how does Khan's losses to Garcia and Peterson change the fact Bradley ducked Khan? Its so sad you had to resort to a triangle theories: "Oh Bradley beat Peterson who beat Khan". With that logic Khan beat Kotelnik who beat Alexander.

            Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View Post
            Bradley made a very good busniess decision for himself..Deal with it..Also deal with the fact,Khan fighting Mccloskey open the door for Bradley to not have to fight him..If he'd just went right to the fight with Bradley,and then Bradley ducked him fine..I would agree..To expect Bradley to sign a extension and go into the unknown not knowing,while Khan had a three fight deal(worth close to 4 mill)is not fair and very short sighted..Just thought I'd add my 2 cents..
            Stevenson signed with SHOWTIME because he gets more money and has a safer career that way because he can avoid Kovalev, so lets not call that a duck either and lets deal with it.

            p.s I want Stevenson to win his fights because he is Canadian, but he ducked Kovalev

            Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View Post
            Can you point out the untrue part of this post??
            Oh the fact that Bradley ducked Khan and you are backing it up with hollow arguments about business move this and diverting the discussion with Khan's losses to peterson and garcia and the triangle theory of bradley beat peterson who beat Khan.

            Khan ducked Alexander, but Bradley didnt? Brilliant.

            This right here:



            Comment


            • yea a top 10 p4p fighter is gonna duck some chinny has been with a delusional fanbase.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Box-Office View Post
                Bradley fan made the damn thread. We are just responding.
                I'm not a Bradley fan. If you look at my bets I'm actually hoping to win a lot of points off of his fans tomorrow night.

                But I do have to call it like I see it.

                Tim was trying to secure a fight against a more dangerous fighter than Khan. For a much bigger payday than Khan. That is not ducking in my book.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
                  I'm not a Bradley fan. If you look at my bets I'm actually hoping to win a lot of points off of his fans tomorrow night.

                  But I do have to call it like I see it.

                  Tim was trying to secure a fight against a more dangerous fighter than Khan. For a much bigger payday than Khan. That is not ducking in my book.
                  Of course it's not. As long as you're "trying to secure" a potential fight at some distant point in the future, you can't be accused of ducking.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
                    Of course it's not. As long as you're "trying to secure" a potential fight at some distant point in the future, you can't be accused of ducking.

                    Tim took concrete steps to get the fight. It's not like he was just giving lip service or magically wishing for it to happen.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
                      Tim took concrete steps to get the fight. It's not like he was just giving lip service or magically wishing for it to happen.
                      Yeah. His concrete steps involved ducking Khan, sitting out his contract, ducking Khan again, fighting Casamayor and the luckily getting the Pacquiao fight 1 year later.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP