Tim Bradley DID NOT duck Khan.

[Robbie Barrett]

There's only 2 people defending Bradley in here probably Bradley himself and wife.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Or face the situation head on and respond to the poster.

You would have sold that "2 fight deal" fairy tale down the river unless I called you on it. Who you kidding?

"But but but it's been a while since I researched the topic"

[IMDAZED]

Because I've been on this site long enough to know exactly what your agenda is.

Why didn't he mention anything about being robbed then?

Everyone on this site has an "agenda" depending on perspective. Try to stick to the topic.

Anyway, probably the same reason he didn't mention "like...legitimately lose." The weird thing is, I listed three possible scenarios, one of which was being robbed. Yet you harp on that and ignore the other two. I think you should keep what I wrote, and what he said, in its proper context. Please refer to initial post.

[IMDAZED]

You would have sold that "2 fight deal" fairy tale down the river unless I called you on it. Who you kidding?

"But but but it's been a while since I researched the topic"

More posts about me? Even when I was talking to someone else? Well then, go on.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Everyone on this site has an "agenda" depending on perspective. Try to stick to the topic.

Anyway, probably the same reason he didn't mention "like...legitimately lose." The weird thing is, I listed three possible scenarios, one of which was being robbed. Yet you harp on that and ignore the other two. I think you should keep what I wrote, and what he said, in its proper context. Please refer to initial post.

Because you would never admit that one of your boys was worried about losing a fight to a guy you don't like (Khan). The agenda is obvious.

[IMDAZED]

Because you would never admit that one of your boys was worried about losing a fight to a guy you don't like (Khan). The agenda is obvious.

Good thing it's not about me (although you can't stop talking about me). Try to keep things in its proper context.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Good thing it's not about me (although you can't stop talking about me). Try to keep things in its proper context.

Why can't you admit that Bradley saw Amir Khan's style and ability as a legitimate threat to his undefeated record and his future career?

Wonder why that is such a deep point of pride for you.

[IMDAZED]

Why can't you admit that Bradley saw Amir Khan's style and ability as a legitimate threat to his undefeated record and his future career?

Wonder why that is such a deep point of pride for you.

No need to wonder because it's not about me. Concerning yourself with me is strange.

Anyway, I do believe he saw Khan as a threat. But I think, more importantly, he recognized that fighting Khan (or any other big name) without any promoter would be unwise. But he did say that he was willing to fight Khan once his situation was settled. What he didn't expect was to be tied up in court for the rest of the year with Shaw.

[Accountoffline]

Lol ofcourse he ducked him, you forget what he himself said***8230; "What if I lose to Khan"

Would love to see Khan vs Bradley after the Pac fight assuming Pac KO's his Alien arse

[Dirk Diggler UK]

No need to wonder because it's not about me. Concerning yourself with me is strange.

Anyway, I do believe he saw Khan as a threat. But I think, more importantly, he recognized that fighting Khan (or any other big name) without any promoter would be unwise. But he did say that he was willing to fight Khan once his situation was settled. What he didn't expect was to be tied up in court for the rest of the year with Shaw.

Wonder why he didn't say any of that. I guess I should thank you for showing everyone the hidden meanings in Bradley's words.