Pac vs Bradley 1 decision really that bad?

[SplitSecond]

pacquiao definitely won no matter how close you felt it was and that's the jist of it

giving it to bradley is a tremendous robbery

[megadeth]

I didn't think it was a robbery. The commentating and supposed blow by blow was some of the worst I've ever heard.

[junior gong]

I didn't think it was a robbery. The commentating and supposed blow by blow was some of the worst I've ever heard.

You probably thought Bradley won!

[Stark777]

I have watched the fight 4 times already and still can´t see Bradley winning. And i like him.

[The Noose]

Watched it a few days ago.

There were many close rounds where neither fighter did anything of note.

But i had Pac winning. Bradley clearly won a couple of late rounds.

[Alibata]

Agreed 100%

I think because there's a minority of people who scored this a 115-113 fight for Pacquiao, that people use it to try justify a 115-113 Bradley card. 115-113 Pacquiao, according to most of the people who saw that fight, is a stretch. Considering that, a Bradley win is practically a robbery.

You literally have to praise to high heavens, every shot Bradley threw and assume they hit, whilst saying Pacquiao landed nothing of significance at all.

The only posters I see here who actually scored it for Bradley seem to be one of two types - either very pro-Bradley or typically anti-Pacquiao...

looking at the posts this is very true.

[Alibata]

Yes, Floyd fans like Thomas Hauser and Brian Kenny.

You aint helping the cause any

[hugh grant]

One thing that cant be understated is that anyone who says Bradley won is an anonymous face.

If a camera is on you, you will have to tell the truth. Even Team Mayweather cant lie as they are public figures.

It will take a brave man to say Bradley won publicly. Annonymously you will also have people say Canelo beat Floyd.

[Craveman]

Rewatched and I thought it was close. I think Bradley would probably win this time.

[Curtiz]

Robbery my ass.