Pac vs Bradley 1 decision really that bad?
Collapse
-
I felt pacquaio clearly won even though your right about lampley. Every punch pac throws he hypes to the max. Even the rounds where pac wasnt throwing much its not like tim was lighting it upComment
-
Comment
-
Yes, it was that bad. Rewatched the entire thing the other day and it was a wipeout.
I had it 10-2 Pac.. At worst, maybe you could argue 8-4 Pac.
Under no circumstance did Bradley win 7 rounds in that 12 round fight.Comment
-
Anyone saying this was not a robbery must be implying that Tim Bradley could have possibly won atleast 6 rounds.
A logical fallacy since by no objective measure did he win atleast 6. The most he could have possibly won was 5.
Therefore it must be considered a robbery.Comment
-
This right here. I said it before that Tim didn't take advantage when PAC wasn't fighting so I don't know why some people is saying Tim out worked manny, etc.Comment
-
Speaking as someone who WAS rooting for Tim in the first fight (just to end the will they wont they bs with Mayweather and Manny) I scored only three rounds for Bradley. It was a very clear and easy fight to score in my mind. Even with a Manny who only fought in short bursts. Tim just beat the dog **** out of air all night. I laughed for days after the fight because it is clear what Bob intended to do when he paid for that win. The fact that it backfired in an epic way was a thing of beauty.Comment
-
I scored it 7-5 Pacquiao on fight night but was drinking and hanging out. Amidst all the controversy I watched it again with an emphasis on scoring it and ended up with a card of 8-4 in favor of Pacquiao. I think I gave Bradley 2, 10, 11 and 12 but I'm not 100% sure since it has been awhile.
Edit: oops i put i scored it 7-5 Bradley but meant 7-5 Pacauiao.Last edited by DeadLikeMe; 04-09-2014, 12:26 PM.Comment
-
Comment