Pac vs Bradley 1 decision really that bad?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • A-Wolf
    This One Can See
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Nov 2011
    • 6759
    • 265
    • 337
    • 61,371

    #71
    Originally posted by jayblack
    I agree with you. That was one of the worse commentated fights ever. Pac was given credit for missing many shots. However i did still have Pac winning the fight. I scored it 7-5. I though Pac clearly won 7 rounds and Bradley clearly won 5. Many times Pac only fought for the final 10-20 seconds of a roound. It's hard to give a guy the round when he took off 90% of the round. And like you I think Bradley wins the rematch. Now whether they give him the decision is another topic.
    Which rounds?

    Comment

    • bojangles1987
      bo jungle
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jul 2009
      • 41118
      • 1,326
      • 357
      • 63,028

      #72
      Originally posted by A-Wolf
      Which rounds?
      Guarantee its 1, 2, and 10-12. People seem to actually believe Bradley clearly won those rounds.

      Comment

      • Doctor_Tenma
        Monster
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2009
        • 33313
        • 1,327
        • 1,249
        • 58,127

        #73
        Not a robbery at all, too many fanboys in boxing.

        Comment

        • IronDanHamza
          BoxingScene Icon
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Oct 2009
          • 48371
          • 4,778
          • 266
          • 104,043

          #74
          Originally posted by bojangles1987
          Guarantee its 1, 2, and 10-12. People seem to actually believe Bradley clearly won those rounds.
          How people say he "clearly" won the first 2 is just absolutely mind boggling to me.

          He didn't clearly lose them (I gave him Round 1) but he most definitely didn't clearly win them.

          He didn't clearly win any round to be honest. I gave him the last 3 rounds, 4 in total) but he didn't clearly win or dominate any round.

          Comment

          • bojangles1987
            bo jungle
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jul 2009
            • 41118
            • 1,326
            • 357
            • 63,028

            #75
            Originally posted by IronDanHamza
            How people say he "clearly" won the first 2 is just absolutely mind boggling to me.

            He didn't clearly lose them (I gave him Round 1) but he most definitely didn't clearly win them.

            He didn't clearly win any round to be honest. I gave him the last 3 rounds, 4 in total) but he didn't clearly win or dominate any round.
            There was one round I thought was pretty convincing, I think it was 10. Somewhere around there.

            Comment

            • A-Wolf
              This One Can See
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Nov 2011
              • 6759
              • 265
              • 337
              • 61,371

              #76
              Originally posted by bojangles1987
              Guarantee its 1, 2, and 10-12. People seem to actually believe Bradley clearly won those rounds.
              Bradley did win the last three "clearly." To me anyway. He ^^^ made the mistake of using the term "clearly" though because Bradley "clearly" didn't "clearly" win any other single round.

              Comment

              • A-Wolf
                This One Can See
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Nov 2011
                • 6759
                • 265
                • 337
                • 61,371

                #77
                Originally posted by irondanhamza
                how people say he "clearly" won the first 2 is just absolutely mind boggling to me.

                he didn't clearly lose them (i gave him round 1) but he most definitely didn't clearly win them.

                He didn't clearly win any round to be honest. I gave him the last 3 rounds, 4 in total) but he didn't clearly win or dominate any round.
                +1 ..........

                Comment

                • ADP02
                  Champ
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Apr 2010
                  • 13617
                  • 415
                  • 1
                  • 26,360

                  #78
                  Originally posted by IMDAZED
                  It wasn't a "robbery" at all.

                  Comment

                  • Malius
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • May 2008
                    • 1073
                    • 25
                    • 34
                    • 7,309

                    #79
                    Pac v Marquez 3 was a way bigger robbery, but because Pac was the bigger name people let that **** slide. Pac gets "robbed" once and people go on a ****en 2 year witch hunt holding that L like the lose is on their record.

                    Comment

                    • straightleft
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Mar 2010
                      • 3557
                      • 162
                      • 0
                      • 9,979

                      #80
                      The Mayweathers who hated Pac to the bone said it was a daylight robbery and so did the 5 judges who reviewed the fight. The floydiots will sing a different tune of course.
                      Last edited by straightleft; 04-10-2014, 02:40 AM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP