when do you think a catchweight has actually affected the outcome in a title fight?
i don't see any of these fights being different at 147, 154, 160
Whitaker-chavez
pac-cotto
mayweather-canelo
norris-taylor
hopkins-de la hoya
Maybe Lalonde going down a whole division to 168? ray was unquestionaly better, even in 1988, but smaller. hearns really won the rematch with ray, fought at 164. Would he have won more convinicngly at 168?
i don't see any of these fights being different at 147, 154, 160
Whitaker-chavez
pac-cotto
mayweather-canelo
norris-taylor
hopkins-de la hoya
Maybe Lalonde going down a whole division to 168? ray was unquestionaly better, even in 1988, but smaller. hearns really won the rematch with ray, fought at 164. Would he have won more convinicngly at 168?
Comment