His success or lack thereof against Floyd doesn't make him a C- fighter. He's a proven fighter already. Marquez lost every round against Floyd, Guerrero almost got stopped by brittle hands, Ortiz lost it mentally and got Ko'd, Cotto won 3 rds and everyone said he did amazing, Mosley won 1 round and got brutalized.
Every Mayweather fan is their own worst enemy when it comes to talking about Floyd, his accomplishments and resume. You have basically called everyone Mayweather has faced lately a C- fighter.
Hes been a garbage fighter his whole career. You some kind of new fan or something?
Hes been a garbage fighter his whole career. You some kind of new fan or something?
Maidana has never been good.
Maidana is going to lose every round, and make Floyd cry foul and run sprints across the ring in the process. It's going to be a very entertaining night for me.
Because. MM is an experienced veteran with power in both hands. He knows how to faint and set up his power shots. We knew going in that he was the best fighter that Broner had ever faced, and even Broner said the same. We also knew of Broner's leaky defense and lack of work rate. Well, at least I did. I knew it would be a great test for Broner and a really good fight. Floyd has seen MM's style for most of his career. There isn't much MM can do that we haven't seen already. I like MM's honesty as a fighter. I don't like Floyd because he doesn't have balls BUT I respect his skill In that ring. At the end of the day, I give honest assessments and opinions about boxing. I am not a fanboy by any means. You might not like what I say, but you have to respect it because it's coming from an honest place.
So, you respect Broner, for "taking risks unlike Floyd", by fighting Maidana, , who in your words is a "C Level fighter",whilst Broner is in his prime but, Floyd fighting that exact same person at the age of 37 is a joke?
Makes sense.
So Broner get's credit from you for "taking a risk" against a a "C Level fighter".
Maidana sucks. Deal with it. Hes not a good fighter. You ******s fell into the "broner is like Floyd" crap. The only thing they have in common is that they both are black and professional fighters.
Maidana is garbage ( c-) minus fighter on a good day redslider. Not my problem. He blows and Floyd will beat his ass up and down the ring.
May 3rd is reality check day.
So It's safe to assume that Floyd get's no credit from you for this fight then?
If Maidana is a "C Level Fighter" then why was Broner fighting him such a "Big risk"?
I recall broner being a heavy favorite going into that fight. The only reason maidana was perceived as a risk was because he can crack. Everyone wanted to see how broner would react when getting hit by a full fledged WW with power. Plus real Boxing fans knew broner wasn't as good as he was a made out to be. Ponce DE Leon whooped him. Malignaggi pretty much out boxed him although he had no mustard on his punches. Even Lil Gavin Reese was able to get to broner and repeatedly land until broner overwhelmed him.
I recall broner being a heavy favorite going into that fight. The only reason maidana was perceived as a risk was because he can crack. Everyone wanted to see how broner would react when getting hit by a full fledged WW with power.
Maidana being a "big risk" for Broner is that posters words.
Yet he's changed his mind now on how risky of a fighter Maidana is.
Maidana being a "big risk" for Broner is that posters words.
Yet he's changed his mind now on how risky of a fighter Maidana is.
Whats so hard to understand? Yes maidana was a threat to broner because broner was never as good as they were making him out to be. Maidana himself isn't that great of a boxer. He's slow but has good power behind his punches. Floyd on the other hand is miles better than broner will ever be and will have a field day with the slow plodding maidana.
So yes maidana was risky for broner but he doesn't bring that same risk when it comes to Floyd.
Comment