Originally posted by junior gong
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Does Lomanchenko losing make Rigo look better ?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by brickcityboxing View PostAnd why's that ? They both got signed by the same promoter, both got fast tracked for a title shot based off their abilities and ATG amateur records, both happen to be in the same neighborhood as far as weight is concerned. One of them came up short, the other is on most people's p4p list. Now that's not to say Loma's loss or even a win would've affected Rigo's status but it still begs the question ... Did Loma looking the way he did last night make you appreciate what we have in Rigo more ?
Comment
-
Why does everyone insist this was Lomachenko's second bout outside amateur boxing?
As if the World Series bouts were not relevant. He fought a bunch of 5 rounders set up in as professional a style as can be.
Not to take anything away from the great amateur that he was and the probably great pro he will be but "ooh it's only his second pro bout, it was a massive transition", please come off it
Comment
-
Originally posted by frosty-g View PostWhy does everyone insist this was Lomachenko's second bout outside amateur boxing?
As if the World Series bouts were not relevant. He fought a bunch of 5 rounders set up in as professional a style as can be.
Not to take anything away from the great amateur that he was and the probably great pro he will be but "ooh it's only his second pro bout, it was a massive transition", please come off it
Comment
-
Originally posted by junior gong View PostBecause its an absolutely dumb comparison. Why would anyone appreciate Rigo more because another unrelated fighter took a narrow loss in a world title shot in his second fight. Loma should have had more fights as with 2-3 more bouts he wouldnt have had much trouble with siri. They gambled, went after history and lost. It says nothing at all about Rigo, positive or otherwise.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dan_cov View PostI think its a loss for Rigo. If Loma had won he'd of made history and the bandwagon would be ridiculous and many would pick him over Rigo.
He'd of had a decent win and some momentum and it would of been two of the greatest amateurs to ever live going at it for all the marbles.
Rigondeaux would of absolutely destroyed Lomachenko and captured another world title in another division.
Rigo is probably a bit gutted he lost especially with the lack of opponents lining up.
Comment
-
Originally posted by brickcityboxing View PostWether you want to believe it or not the comparisons were there to begin with. The two gold medals, the gaudy amateur records, the obvious talent/blinding speed. I know the revisionists will say its apples and oranges, they will also note that Loma's in a different space having only had 1 pro bout prior, which is debatable. But Loma was being touted by some as the next Rigo. Regardless of how the fight played out (ref,low blows,scoring etc...), do you feel seeing Loma having been "cut from the same cloth" as Rigo, struggling and losing, shows just how remarkable and how difficult it is to accomplish what Rigo did in under 10 fights (not counting Donaire). In other words is Loma's loss Rigo's win ?
Fair or not, Lomo's loss makes "El Chacal" look better. It's all about perception. The shine is gone. Vasyl no longer has that aura. I think it draws attention to how hard it is to become a bona fide world champion so quickly.
Comment
-
I guarantee you that if Rigondeaux had fought an Orlando Salido equivalent in his second pro fight, he would have done no better than Lomachenko.
So no, it doesn't make Rigondeaux look any better.
Comment
-
Absolutely not.
People seem to forget how much Rigo struggled with a past prime Cordoba and a mediocre Marroquin before he finally put it all together against Donaire. I really don't think Rigo would have beaten an opponent of Salido's caliber in his second pro fight.
Comment
Comment