What I wrote was perfectly coherent. But if you want to be pedantic about syntax, allow me to point out that Carl did not ONLY win because he was gifted a stoppage. He won because he stayed the course better than Groves and had him hurt and wobbling from a barrage of hard punches.
The stoppage was bad because it was premature, but, imo, it was a gift to Groves rather than Froch.
We'll never know for sure, but it looked to me like Groves was heading for a ko defeat, and if Foster hadn't jumped in when he did, this rematch would not be happening.
The stoppage was bad because it was premature, but, imo, it was a gift to Groves rather than Froch.
We'll never know for sure, but it looked to me like Groves was heading for a ko defeat, and if Foster hadn't jumped in when he did, this rematch would not be happening.
Comment