Originally posted by Doctor_Tenma
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What makes Erislandy Lara so great?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by BoxingGenius27 View PostA few posts from the Lara - Vanes Round by Round discussion:
Again, tell me specifically what 4 rounds you gave Martyrosyan and what 10-10 round you scored to make this a draw.
Here's the round-by-round punch stats if you're curious (Lara 74-33 Vanes):
http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/vi...vanes-compubox
Comment
-
Originally posted by Doctor_Tenma View PostThat's how I felt as well, neither of them deserved to win.
That's just fan boy talk.
In actuality what happens is, these "posters" hype these fighters up in the pre-fight hype. Then when it doesn't go accordingly and it's a close fight, they say "figter A" was clearly winning when "fighter A" wasn't.
Let's be objective here
Comment
-
Originally posted by BafanaBafana View PostYou should answer my question instead of handpicking troll posts to confirm your bias. What I do remember in these threads is that a lot of people thought the fight was extremely boring because neither guy was pushing the action for much of the fight, which still doesn't change the fact that Lara was the only one landing punches.
Again, tell me specifically what 4 rounds you gave Martyrosyan and what 10-10 round you scored to make this a draw.
Here's the round-by-round punch stats if you're curious (Lara 74-33 Vanes):
http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/vi...vanes-compubox
I'm not gonna go back and tell you what specific rounds from over a year ago. You do it. I'll try and get to it tomorrow if you want to talk about it.
And a lot of the guys I quoted aren't trolls.Last edited by BoxingGenius27; 02-08-2014, 10:00 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BoxingGenius27 View PostExactly that's why I can't help but laugh when I see guys saying he was clearly winning...
That's just fan boy talk.
In actuality what happens is, these "posters" hype these fighters up in the pre-fight hype. Then when it doesn't go accordingly and it's a close fight, they say "figter A" was clearly winning when "fighter A" wasn't.
Let's be objective here
I don't care how boring it was, the guy landing all the punches clearly wins the fight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BoxingGenius27 View PostExactly that's why I can't help but laugh when I see guys saying he was clearly winning...
That's just fan boy talk.
In actuality what happens is, these "posters" hype these fighters up in the pre-fight hype. Then when it doesn't go accordingly and it's a close fight, they say "figter A" was clearly winning when "fighter A" wasn't.
Let's be objective here
Comment
-
I don't see Lara being great but he is a real skilled fighter. Who can frustrate his opponents with his foot work and left cross.
I would like to see Lara vs Mayweather this year. Even if it is a chess match with two counter punchers. I like watching those type of fights once in a while like a Marquez vs Casamayor.
I see Mayweather winning the fight but I also see Lara winning more rounds against him than a Khan or a Maidana at 147.
Comment
-
Truth is about Lara is fir every impressive showing he has, he has at least 2 mind boggling unimpressive ones. Story of his career. This is why I don't understand this idea that he's so superior to the other jmws. They are all the same level. Been saying it since canelo back when everyone thought he'd destroy Lara. My how times have changed. But that's nsb for u.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Doctor_Tenma View PostWell Angulo has been overhyped to a disgustingly new level, the slow fuck
All because he gave Lara lots of trouble....
Comment
Comment