Your 1st post is still full of $h!t. Because you're still replying to me betting. Like I've told you repeatedly I'm betting and Mikey, (with someone not called iron dan). I've never reneged on a bet. Therefore your 1st post doesn't apply and is rather irrelevant. No amount of post since then can change the irrelevance of it, period.
How much credit does Gamboa get for whooping Mikey?
Collapse
-
It was just a list though he never tested positive. The fact Mikey works with Ariza makes him just as suspect in my book especially considering according to Ariza he was taking all the same things that Rios was who did test positive.
Not that I feel DMAA should be banned anyway.Comment
-
I'm replying to your prediction, which is "Garcia is going to destroy Gamboa".Your 1st post is still full of $h!t. Because you're still replying to me betting. Like I've told you repeatedly I'm betting and Mikey, (with someone not called iron dan). I've never reneged on a bet. Therefore your 1st post doesn't apply and is rather irrelevant. No amount of post since then can change the irrelevance of it, period.
I'm asking you if that's a lie or the truth. Because we know that you make predictions and then when you lose say you were lieing. That's something we do know.
My response wasn't aimed at anything to do with betting. Merely your prediction, and whether it was the truth this time, or another one of your classic "I was lying" moments.Comment
-
Comment
-
You're response was made to a post where I invited a bet with someone not named you. A bet, of which I've never reneged. meaning your post asking if I'm lying, still to this very post, has no bearing on what I've stated throughout this tread. When I believe a fighter is going to win, I'm willing to bet. never bet against your infatuation. Obviously for a reason.I'm replying to your prediction, which is "Garcia is going to destroy Gamboa".
I'm asking you if that's a lie or the truth. Because we know that you make predictions and then when you lose say you were lieing. That's something we do know.
My response wasn't aimed at anything to do with betting. Merely your prediction, and whether it was the truth this time, or another one of your classic "I was lying" moments.
But one more time for ya, Mikey/Gamboa, willing to bet. of which all I've paid.Comment
-
Your*You're response was made to a post where I invited a bet with someone not named you. A bet, of which I've never reneged. meaning your post asking if I'm lying, still to this very post, has no bearing on what I've stated throughout this tread. When I believe a fighter is going to win, I'm willing to bet. never bet against your infatuation. Obviously for a reason.
But one more time for ya, Mikey/Gamboa, willing to bet. of which all I've paid.
Also you two need to have buttsex and get it over with already.Comment
-
Comment
-
Cubans don't do anything wrong. Check out the article on here about Yuri's scandal and the Cubans comment that he should just stay silent and people will eventually forget about it. Which is true kind of, because I did forget about it.
Alex Rodriguez got suspended for the whole season because of the scandal, but the whole boxing world sweeps Yuri's s**t under the rug. God forbid J.C. Chavez Jr. smoking some weed though.Comment
-
How many times do I need to tell you I was not replying to your bet offer but to your prediction?You're response was made to a post where I invited a bet with someone not named you. A bet, of which I've never reneged. meaning your post asking if I'm lying, still to this very post, has no bearing on what I've stated throughout this tread. When I believe a fighter is going to win, I'm willing to bet. never bet against your infatuation. Obviously for a reason.
But one more time for ya, Mikey/Gamboa, willing to bet. of which all I've paid.
Read it, let it sink in.
So are you telling the truth this time or is it another one of those lies?Comment
Comment