Comments Thread For: Groves: Carl Froch is Scared of The Damage in Rematch

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dirk Diggler UK
    Deleted
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jun 2008
    • 48836
    • 1,312
    • 693
    • 58,902

    #121
    Originally posted by D4thincarnation
    You have a copy of the contract at hand do you, I sure would like a read.
    No but Groves didn't accept because Hearn asked for a rematch clause and options. These are standard requests when making a voluntary defence. Hence the word "voluntary".

    Originally posted by D4thincarnation
    I don't like liars and charlatans.
    You must really hate George Groves then.

    Comment

    • SP4RTICUS
      Contender
      • Aug 2013
      • 344
      • 12
      • 0
      • 6,459

      #122
      sure frock should go chavez jr, bank a couple of mill, get on us tv, and then make the fight later in the year when it will be even bigger.
      Let ginger spout off meantime and fight a domestic opponent for peanuts, if not for the money then for the satisfaction of a cold, hard, backhanded,b1tch. slapdown.

      Comment

      • D4thincarnation
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jan 2011
        • 16198
        • 533
        • 260
        • 133,240

        #123
        Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
        No but Groves didn't accept because Hearn asked for a rematch clause and options. These are standard requests when making a voluntary defence. Hence the word "voluntary".



        You must really hate George Groves then.
        Groves is the mandatory challenger.

        Groves speaks the truth, did exactly what he said he would do to Carl.

        Froch didn't do $ hit

        Comment

        • Dirk Diggler UK
          Deleted
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jun 2008
          • 48836
          • 1,312
          • 693
          • 58,902

          #124
          Originally posted by D4thincarnation
          Groves is the mandatory challenger.

          Groves speaks the truth, did exactly what he said he would do to Carl.

          Froch didn't do $ hit
          When the offer was made, Groves was not the mandatory challenger. Hence the rematch clause and options. I'm glad I could educate you on this matter.

          Yeah Groves did what he said. Landed two right hands. I don't remember the part where he said he'd get repeatedly tagged and hurt against the ropes and then slump forward with his head down.

          Froch didn't do **** except have Groves on the brink of being knocked out.

          Comment

          • jas
            Voice of Reason
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jul 2005
            • 22500
            • 933
            • 908
            • 1,059,614

            #125
            bottom line is froch calls the shots. he wont vacate his belt .he will be a big fav in the rematch. he will fight groves. once groves realises you cant do anything about the politics and he will have to accept 15% the fight will be made. froch sparks groves .

            watch the first fight d4 instead of d1kriding georgie boy. froch was rushing in like a complete amateur with his chin up in the air crossing his feet and ending up with a squared up stance. he wanted to go in there and spark groves out early because he didnt rate groves chin. froch was beginning to outland groves once he realised hes gotta be a tad bit more smart about it and think about defence.

            in the rematch , groves tries to push froch back again because he knows carl fights worse going backwards. froch will fight more patient. froch uses his jab more .mixes up his attack to the body and the head.waits for groves to tire a bit and gets him out of there late.

            dirk diggler is absolutely destroying d4 in the debate. its like hopkins-trinindad type punishment.

            Comment

            • Dirk Diggler UK
              Deleted
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jun 2008
              • 48836
              • 1,312
              • 693
              • 58,902

              #126
              Originally posted by D4thincarnation
              Froch didn't do $ hit


              "Hi I'm George Groves' face and I strongly disagree with you"

              Comment

              • D4thincarnation
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Jan 2011
                • 16198
                • 533
                • 260
                • 133,240

                #127
                Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                When the offer was made, Groves was not the mandatory challenger. Hence the rematch clause and options. I'm glad I could educate you on this matter.

                Yeah Groves did what he said. Landed two right hands. I don't remember the part where he said he'd get repeatedly tagged and hurt against the ropes and then slump forward with his head down.

                Froch didn't do **** except have Groves on the brink of being knocked out.
                And later that week the IBF made Groves the mandatory.
                So what changed that week from making Froch wanting the rematch to not wanting it?

                Comment

                • D4thincarnation
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jan 2011
                  • 16198
                  • 533
                  • 260
                  • 133,240

                  #128
                  Originally posted by jas
                  bottom line is froch calls the shots. he wont vacate his belt .he will be a big fav in the rematch. he will fight groves. once groves realises you cant do anything about the politics and he will have to accept 15% the fight will be made. froch sparks groves .

                  watch the first fight d4 instead of d1kriding georgie boy. froch was rushing in like a complete amateur with his chin up in the air crossing his feet and ending up with a squared up stance. he wanted to go in there and spark groves out early because he didnt rate groves chin. froch was beginning to outland groves once he realised hes gotta be a tad bit more smart about it and think about defence.

                  in the rematch , groves tries to push froch back again because he knows carl fights worse going backwards. froch will fight more patient. froch uses his jab more .mixes up his attack to the body and the head.waits for groves to tire a bit and gets him out of there late.

                  dirk diggler is absolutely destroying d4 in the debate. its like hopkins-trinindad type punishment.

                  Froch was clueless, he was getting out jabbed frightened to throw punches looking to his corner and into crowd for help. He was also holding and his best shots on Groves was when he was hitting on the break, which he did repeatedly. I don't know how Froch got away with it.

                  Oh wait.......... Eddie Hearn and Howard Foster, that's how he got away with it.

                  Comment

                  • Dirk Diggler UK
                    Deleted
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jun 2008
                    • 48836
                    • 1,312
                    • 693
                    • 58,902

                    #129
                    Originally posted by D4thincarnation
                    And later that week the IBF made Groves the mandatory.
                    So what changed that week from making Froch wanting the rematch to not wanting it?
                    Where do you get the idea that Froch has changed anything?

                    Comment

                    • D4thincarnation
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Jan 2011
                      • 16198
                      • 533
                      • 260
                      • 133,240

                      #130
                      Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                      Where do you get the idea that Froch has changed anything?
                      Because the fight hasn't been signed as yet.

                      If the fight happens or if Froch doesn't get stripped then Froch wanted the fight.

                      If Froch does get stripped, it means he doesn't want the fight and his original offer was not genuine.


                      Like I told you before it is up in the air at the moment, but if I was a beating man I would go for Froch to continue being a charlatan and a liar.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP