Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Groves: Carl Froch is Scared of The Damage in Rematch

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
    Groves knows he got very lucky in both fights. The hypocrisy from the Team Gayemaker fanboys is astounding.
    Do you believe groves is afraid of getting in the ring with degale and anderson?

    Resorting to gaymaker insults. come on.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
      Groves hasn't said that at all. He still wants more money.
      This ^.

      Alas, I fear this is a lost cause. The Hayemaker fans are a moronic lot.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
        Who cares how much the purse was? DeGale rematch was Groves' biggest and most profitable fight at the time but he didn't want none. He instead fought a guy that DeGale had already embarrassed.
        Groves beat DeGale albeit in a close fight. There was no clamour for an immediate rematch and both guys were still learning their trade and a fight further down the line is what every was looking for.

        Froch on the other hand got a beating for 9 rounds and was save by some "peeleft: poor refereeing. And not the sanctioning body also have agreed with this.

        What is Froch's excuse if he doesn't take the fight?

        Comment


        • Originally posted by adietheforestfa View Post
          Yea Degale was competitive, where Froch wasn't!!! Numpty!!!

          Degale Lost.

          Froch was one point down, and WON by TKO

          What is your point???

          DeGale lost in a very competitive fight, close rounds close fight.

          Froch got schooled, beaten up and save by an incompetent or corrupt ref.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
            The clauses are common for a voluntary defence which is what I've been trying to drum into your head.

            Bradley put the same clauses in his fight offer to Kell Brook. Did that mean it was "deigned" to make Brook say no? Was Bradley "never serious" about wanting to fight Brook?


            Common now are they


            Earlier they were always

            Comment


            • Originally posted by D4thincarnation View Post
              Groves beat DeGale albeit in a close fight. There was no clamour for an immediate rematch and both guys were still learning their trade and a fight further down the line is what every was looking for.
              There was no clamour for an immediate rematch? Who did Groves fight instead?

              Paul Smith
              Francisco Sierra
              50 year old Glen Johnson
              Dario Balmaceda
              Baker Bakerat
              Noe Gonzalez

              I'm glad Groves gave the fans what they really wanted by staging these epic fights instead.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by D4thincarnation View Post
                Groves beat DeGale albeit in a close fight. There was no clamour for an immediate rematch and both guys were still learning their trade and a fight further down the line is what every was looking for.

                Froch on the other hand got a beating for 9 rounds and was save by some "peeleft: poor refereeing. And not the sanctioning body also have agreed with this.

                What is Froch's excuse if he doesn't take the fight?
                "Groves priced himself out of a rematch"; "I was offered more $$$ to fight Chavez Jr in Vegas"; "Andre Ward has offered me a rematch" etc.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by FrankieBruno View Post
                  Groves has said he'll take the ibfs offer, its up to Froch if he wants to fight or run, either way Groves gets a shot at the title

                  I betting Froch doesn't want it, and he knew that half way through the 6th round of the first fight fight.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by yoz View Post
                    This ^.

                    Alas, I fear this is a lost cause. The Hayemaker fans are a moronic lot.
                    read the last sentence of the article posted

                    "either he has to fight or drop the title in disgrace"

                    Groves is taking the fight for 15%, Froch is running scared

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by D4thincarnation View Post
                      Common now are they


                      Earlier they were always
                      Common....always. Are you down to debating semantics because you have nothing else to challenge me on? If a promoter is dumb enough not to put a rematch clause in a contract against a voluntary then they aren't doing their job probably.

                      There's nothing "dodgy" or uncommon about the contract Groves was offered and rejected.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP