George Groves not happy with 15%; will lobby IBF for more

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • boliodogs
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • May 2008
    • 33358
    • 824
    • 1,782
    • 309,589

    #31
    Originally posted by El Angel
    Being honest, he does deserve more than 15%. Not the majority or even close, but 75-25 would even be more fair. Wouldn't surprise me if Froch vacated the title and fight JCC Jr. Froch and Groves can always rematch later in the year. I'd like to see Froch-Chavez Jr.
    I agree. 75-25 is fair. 85-15 does not seem fair to Groves. He is a popular fighter and he was winning the fight before it was stopped.

    Comment

    • Dirk Diggler UK
      Deleted
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jun 2008
      • 48836
      • 1,312
      • 693
      • 58,902

      #32
      Originally posted by boliodogs
      I agree. 75-25 is fair. 85-15 does not seem fair to Groves. He is a popular fighter and he was winning the fight before it was stopped.
      15% is what you get under the rules.

      The IBF are a joke though so I wouldn't be surprised if they change their rules again to accommodate Groves.

      Comment

      • Russian Crushin
        atheist with a gun
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Dec 2009
        • 33788
        • 1,472
        • 836
        • 46,625

        #33
        Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
        A rematch clause is standard fare when you make a voluntary defence of your title against someone who is not the mandatory.
        Question is how can they mandate a fight, without you being the mando after being the mando in the previous fight, where you were deemed to have gotten an unfair ruling?

        Comment

        • Dirk Diggler UK
          Deleted
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jun 2008
          • 48836
          • 1,312
          • 693
          • 58,902

          #34
          Originally posted by Russian Crushin
          Question is how can they mandate a fight, without you being the mando after being the mando in the previous fight, where you were deemed to have gotten an unfair ruling?
          Well the IBF have made him mandatory now. When Hearn made the offer, he was not the mandatory hence the rematch clause/options.

          Comment

          • TGD
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Dec 2012
            • 1860
            • 57
            • 64
            • 8,194

            #35
            Appeal has been rejected. 85 - 15 split is upheld

            Comment

            • jas
              Voice of Reason
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jul 2005
              • 22542
              • 937
              • 914
              • 1,059,614

              #36
              Lol groves whining like a baby cost him.

              Comment

              • IronDanHamza
                BoxingScene Icon
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Oct 2009
                • 49793
                • 5,101
                • 270
                • 104,043

                #37
                Originally posted by TGD
                Appeal has been rejected. 85 - 15 split is upheld
                Source?????

                Comment

                • lfc19titles
                  Undisputed Champion
                  • Mar 2010
                  • 8732
                  • 725
                  • 628
                  • 94,838

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Weebler I
                  I think Froch's initial offer was close to 75-25, but the IBF ruling means Groves is only entitled to 15%. The appeal kind of backfired financially.
                  The offer made by match room was with groves signing a 3 fight deal with them which he did not want to do

                  Comment

                  • yoz
                    Yoz
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • May 2011
                    • 8617
                    • 439
                    • 427
                    • 16,868

                    #39
                    LOL.

                    Justice.

                    Comment

                    • Weebler I
                      El Weeblerito I
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Dec 2007
                      • 31114
                      • 1,468
                      • 1,648
                      • 54,550

                      #40
                      Originally posted by lfc19titles
                      The offer made by match room was with groves signing a 3 fight deal with them which he did not want to do
                      Yeah, that's kind of annoying for the fans who were keen on a rematch.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP