Comments Thread For: Groves Shocked With Froch Statement Over Rematch

[hugh grant]

Is Groves a businessman or fighter? You got your rematch and when you beat Froch, the world is your oyster.

The Froch fight isn't your superfight, you will have superfights down the line and have plenty of time to make the real money. Getting the rematch is the main thing with Froch.

But maybe Groves thinks he will lose to Froch, so has to make as much money as he possibly can in that one fight as he may not get another chance to again, or at least for a very long time.

[LacedUp]

Anderson beating Groves would have changed his life. Winning the British title and beating a top prospect would have put him on the map. There shouldn't be any extra leniency just because its a world title.

I have something against Groves because he's a prick. It's not my fault that that's one of the main attributes you need to be involved with Hayemaker.

Maybe there shouldn't, but there is. A world title fight is clearly different from a british title fight. Anderson wouldn't have been on any map. He is british level.

And for the record, after being put down in the 3rd, Groves dominated him pretty much every second of every subsequent round.

As soon as he decided to stop slugging, he was good. Not justifying the stoppage at all, because it was early, but Groves wasn't out of the fight at all and I believe he was ahead on every scorecard.

Anderson was missing wildly, couldn't even land a jab. He managed to land about 3 right hands from rounds 4-6.

Oh and by the way, just seen the fight once more, the Froch stoppage was clearly worse. Which is why Anderson didn't even complain.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Maybe there shouldn't, but there is. A world title fight is clearly different from a british title fight. Anderson wouldn't have been on any map. He is british level.

And for the record, after being put down in the 3rd, Groves dominated him pretty much every second of every subsequent round.

As soon as he decided to stop slugging, he was good. Not justifying the stoppage at all, because it was early, but Groves wasn't out of the fight at all and I believe he was ahead on every scorecard.

Anderson was missing wildly, couldn't even land a jab. He managed to land about 3 right hands from rounds 4-6.

Oh and by the way, just seen the fight once more, the Froch stoppage was clearly worse. Which is why Anderson didn't even complain.

Can't be arsed talking to someone who is so biased that they become blind to actual evidence.

[LacedUp]

Can't be arsed talking to someone who is so biased that they become blind to actual evidence.

Go and watch round 4-6 and point out where Anderson dominated Groves in that sequence please.

Groves stuck the jab to him, moved around, threw the right hand to the body and head - uppercuts. He was actually putting on a really good performance.

But hey, it's you. Everything Groves does is *****, right?

[jas]

Can you two get a room so you can f each other without annoying the rest of us.

Lacedup your f in annoying. You always wanna argue and find small childish ass holes (excuse the double meaning) in peoples arguments. Then you make threads and argue with with the peeps that post in them whilst you randomly bump the thread.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

But hey, it's you. Everything Groves does is *****, right?

So menstrual

[bojangles1987]

Groves said on a SkySports interview yesterday that he isn't even asking for 50/50, he just wants a good payday but he doesn't want all the stipulations that Hearn was apparently asking for and knowing how duplicitous promoters can be, I can imagine some of Hearn's terms.

He's going to get less by not taking the offer made, though. I can't speak to what terms may have been in it, but if money is the issue then he stands to suffer from the IBF ruling.

[LacedUp]

Can you two get a room so you can f each other without annoying the rest of us.

Lacedup your f in annoying. You always wanna argue and find small childish ass holes (excuse the double meaning) in peoples arguments. Then you make threads and argue with with the peeps that post in them whilst you randomly bump the thread.

Who are you dude?

[LacedUp]

So menstrual

when that's all you got..

[Dirk Diggler UK]

when that's all you got..

When you start ascribing things to people then you've already lost. When did I say Groves was ****? That's just your vagina twitching whenever someone says anything remotely negative about one of your man crushes.

You're a guy who claimed that Carl Froch didn't land anything clean in the finish to the Groves fight and according to IronDanHamza, you orginally stated that he hardly landed anything at all during the fight....LOL there's no reconciling with that degree of delusion and bias.