Why did Schaefer lie about the rematch clause?
Collapse
-
Yet why didn't Paulie get a rematch?
Some think he won, it was a damn close fight and Broner didn't exactly do alot to convincingly win it.
One rule for one person another for the next, price of knowing the right people!
Broner is a spoilt little twerp.Comment
-
I'm trying to figure out why you quoted me though. My post consisted of pointing out that the Broner rematch is the best thing for Marcus. I don't see how Paulie fits into that equation, at all.Comment
-
That's the thing that gets me. Some people think one promoter is more of a good guy than another promoter and is really looking out for their fighters. All of these guys are in it to make money and will lie, cheat and steal to get it...same as a politician. Arum is bad but I actually think Schaefer is worse, the guy hides drug test results, downs all his competition and steals from his fighters (I'm surmising here but time will reveal more of his dirt).Schaefer is a shady individual. I remember it clear as day, there was no rematch clause. Bet they thought they could slip that into the contract now somehow and Maidana and his team would have played along. Very happy to see Maidana stand his ground and sit back like he should evaluating his options.
He should demand a Mayweather fight or simply retire.
I think GBP just wanted it to look like there were options for Mayweather but Khan was always going to be the choice.Comment
-
Comment
-
And why are ppl mad about it? Its clear as day Floyd has no interest in fighting maidana. If he did, he could make that fight if he wanted to. What else is out there better than broner ? Thurman is his mando but maidana seems to he keen on ducking him. Why don't ppl state that?Comment
-
I been asking that same question.Curious to know why Schaefer would lie about it. At first he says there was none now there is one. They are both promoted by GB so I'm sure he knew. So is it because they want Broner to avenge his loss to do some damage control to save their future ppv star? Or did he lie about the clause in the beginning thinking Maidana could potentially fight Floyd? Not sure why he would lie.Comment
-
Why are you surprised, Schaefer is the most underhanded guy in boxing now that King is all but irrelevant!Curious to know why Schaefer would lie about it. At first he says there was none now there is one. They are both promoted by GB so I'm sure he knew. So is it because they want Broner to avenge his loss to do some damage control to save their future ppv star? Or did he lie about the clause in the beginning thinking Maidana could potentially fight Floyd? Not sure why he would lie.Comment
-
Your posts ties in with the other poster you quoted... Like you said, they are in it to make money and whatever they need to get done to do so, they will. And I understand that and I think most of us do, the business world is solely driven by the economy aspect. However, what bothers me is how this Richard guy tries to portray himself as a man of the people and his company as the most righteous when in reality they are just as shady as they accuse TR of being.That's the thing that gets me. Some people think one promoter is more of a good guy than another promoter and is really looking out for their fighters. All of these guys are in it to make money and will lie, cheat and steal to get it...same as a politician. Arum is bad but I actually think Schaefer is worse, the guy hides drug test results, downs all his competition and steals from his fighters (I'm surmising here but time will reveal more of his dirt).
I think GBP just wanted it to look like there were options for Mayweather but Khan was always going to be the choice.
I'd rather have them cut the nice company act, it would be easier to just pass these type of things as mere business moves.Comment
Comment