Comments Thread For: “Fighting Words” - On Mendez and Two Punches Too Late

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ElMeroChingon
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Mar 2010
    • 3817
    • 236
    • 87
    • 10,336

    #41
    Originally posted by .:: JSFD26 ::.
    David, I think what DaddyYankee is referring to is that while we know what you just explained to us here, some people reading the article might not. Remember, not everyone visits the forums.


    Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android
    Lol JSFd25 what a punk,



    Hey David. What DaddyYankee and JSFD25 are trying to say is that the only thing wrong with your article is that you put a cuban in a bad light.

    I personally thought it was a great read. Some posters here are used to reading stories and Tall Tales in pictures. Reading is not really their thing.

    Hey JSDF25, sounds like you've "sparred" too many rounds bro.

    Comment

    • Russian Crushin
      atheist with a gun
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Dec 2009
      • 33788
      • 1,471
      • 836
      • 46,625

      #42
      Originally posted by DannYankee09
      He got me obviously not you it ends on the first thing i been saying all along some time **** isn't black or white some times they are grey. It was an unintentional foul just like in the fight you people treat boxing like it's tennis or something with rules and intangibles a lot of boxing is left to be judged by a human being and there is no automatic DQ's in boxing.
      The rule is very black and white tho, you cant hit after the belt. This is not a judgement call where the ref can decide if its ok to hit after the bell or not. The ref has too much control. They should have replayed it at the ring and declared it a NC

      Comment

      • Spray_resistant
        Vacant interim regular(C)
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Feb 2009
        • 29504
        • 2,907
        • 1,531
        • 53,384

        #43
        Originally posted by Russian Crushin
        The rule is very black and white tho, you cant hit after the belt. This is not a judgement call where the ref can decide if its ok to hit after the bell or not. The ref has too much control. They should have replayed it at the ring and declared it a NC
        Fair enough people just have a hard time reconciling it because Barthelemy seemed to be on his way to an easy onesided destruction to win the title and was clearly the better fighter but............rules are rules should be a NC, rematch mando asap.

        Comment

        • ElMeroChingon
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Mar 2010
          • 3817
          • 236
          • 87
          • 10,336

          #44
          Originally posted by Russian Crushin
          The rule is very black and white tho, you cant hit after the belt. This is not a judgement call where the ref can decide if its ok to hit after the bell or not. The ref has too much control. They should have replayed it at the ring and declared it a NC
          I completely agree, they should do the right thing. What Beth did was a disgrace to true boxing fans around the world.

          Comment

          • DannYankee
            Evil Empire
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Oct 2008
            • 7066
            • 338
            • 207
            • 17,249

            #45
            Originally posted by Russian Crushin
            The rule is very black and white tho, you cant hit after the belt. This is not a judgement call where the ref can decide if its ok to hit after the bell or not. The ref has too much control. They should have replayed it at the ring and declared it a NC
            What rule are you talking about!?!?!? There is not a single non flexible 100% automatic rule in boxing there is no automatic DQ **** that's your imagination. I've told you boxing aint some sport where things are always clear cut and neat sometimes shady **** happens just like life and that article that is why it is up to the ref like I've said a gazillion times. If it was black and white we wouldn't need no ref to rule on intentional or unintentional fouls and as previously stated by myself the most they could ever do is rule it a no contest no fking way someone would get like you all where saying DQ for an unintentional foul no way .

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP