Bradley vs Pacquiao II, no excuses for the loser.

[rr00676]

If its Mayweather well the fight is a lil late and I know clowns here talking about "Pacquiao is not in his prime so, no credit to Floyd!" LMAO so since 2009 Floyd somehow stayed in his prime and didnt age??? GTFO
.

Does Hopkins get full credit for beating RJJ?

[Rome-By-Ko]

Again most people IMO are not giving credit to Bradley's work. His body shots and headshots were not getting the credit because they were not really hard or didnt sound hard.

For instance in round 7 Bradley clearly won that round, he didnt dominate but he clearly won it yet you had the HBO crew swinging on Pacquiao's nuts and called the round for Pacquiao.

Since there is actually not alot of objectivity in the scoring criteria its not ****** if people like Brian Kenny saw Bradley win the fight.

Its the HARD PUNCHES VS SCORING POINTS debate which if you actually read the judging criteria it doesnt favor any side of the debate.

I know clowns going to say "BUT BUT ITS NOT AMATEUR BOXING!!!" THEN CHANGE THE FREAKIN JUDGING CRITERIA BECAUSE THE JUDGING CRITERIA DOESNT SPECIFY THAT HARDER PUNCHES WINS THE FIGHTS.

I want either Bradley vs Pacquaio II or Mayweather vs Pacquaio.

I agree with this..

[Rome-By-Ko]

Precisely, there is scoring the right way and scoring the wrong way. Those who see it as a 7-5 Bradley win are scoring wrong.

Dumb post,boxing is subjective..