Bradley vs Pacquiao II, no excuses for the loser.

[Spoon23]

all respect


lost.....

lol lost in translation hahaha! The guy is delusional. He must have seen a different fight.

[shacasulu]

If a football stadium was filled and someone said those who thinks Bradley won I can guarantee you would be the only one standing by yourself against 50,000 person's

Not so, Kellerman spoke after the fight saying that he knows alot of people who he respects that had the fight for Bradley.

He mentioned how in the De La Hoya vs Mosley rematch people saw the HBO crew as being dumbasses for thinking De La Hoya won but Kellerman said he actually thought Mosley won the fight when the HBO crew were the minority that thought De La Hoya won.

I'll post up a thread showing how Bradley could have won 7-5 DEPENDING ON HOW YOU SCORE A FIGHT.

[One Of A Kind]

I'll post up a thread showing how Bradley could have won 7-5 DEPENDING ON HOW YOU SCORE A FIGHT.

Precisely, there is scoring the right way and scoring the wrong way. Those who see it as a 7-5 Bradley win are scoring wrong.

[shacasulu]

Precisely, there is scoring the right way and scoring the wrong way. Those who see it as a 7-5 Bradley win are scoring wrong.

HOW THOUGH???

JUDGING CRITERIA DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE AGAINST SOLID PUNCHES LANDED OVER HARDER PUNCHES LANDED IF THE FORMER WAS LANDED MORE.

Effective punching is completley SUBJECTIVE TO THE JUDGES DISCRETION meaning THERE IS ACTUALLY NO FREAKIN OBJECTIVE DESCRIPTION OF WHAT FREAKING EFFECTIVE PUNCHING ACTUALLY IS!!!

This creates the legendary HARDER PUNCHES VS SCORING MORE debate that has been going on for ages.

Im not saying Bradley won the fight IMO that thing could have gone either way depending on how you score it BECAUSE TECHNICALLY THERE IS NO OBJECTIVE CLEAR SPECIFICS OF WHAT EFFECTIVE PUNCHES ARE.

[WilkinsOlajuwon]

Pac v Bradley is going to be marketed as Pac making his unofficial win over Bradley official.....not as a rematch of a close fight.

There is no need to go back in and review each round. Bradley got a gift from some very old/confused judges. Nevada polled all of their judges and not one gave Bradley the fight. There is no debate.

[takingaim]

Pac loses a rematch badly.

[Bermuda]

pac beat bradley...if u have bradley winning more than 5 rounds you're insane...

bradley lost the first fight...anyone who knows anything knows this...

[Evol]

I said "NO EXCUSES FOR NODODY" meaning no excuses for Mayweather, Bradley, and Pacquiao.

Are you a moron that cant read???

yes i can read and here is what u wrote --

If its Bradley I'll be excited because I never saw this wide lopsided win for Pacquiao. The fight was closer than you think and Bradley was not given credit for his body and head shots. If the rematch happens and Bradley wins no excuses of "Manny is shot now so Bradley gets no credit!" BS. NO EXCUSES

If its Mayweather well the fight is a lil late and I know clowns here talking about "Pacquiao is not in his prime so, no credit to Floyd!" LMAO so since 2009 Floyd somehow stayed in his prime and didnt age??? GTFO


NO EXCUSES FOR NOBODY.


u see, i dont see any explaination as to if pac wins then no excuses either. u only stated bradley and floyd then at the end u put no excuses for nobody. maybe u cant read??

[Spoon23]

And this..

There is no need to go back in and review each round. Bradley got a gift from some very old/confused judges. Nevada polled all of their judges and not one gave Bradley the fight. There is no debate.

[shacasulu]

yes i can read and here is what u wrote --

If its Bradley I'll be excited because I never saw this wide lopsided win for Pacquiao. The fight was closer than you think and Bradley was not given credit for his body and head shots. If the rematch happens and Bradley wins no excuses of "Manny is shot now so Bradley gets no credit!" BS. NO EXCUSES

If its Mayweather well the fight is a lil late and I know clowns here talking about "Pacquiao is not in his prime so, no credit to Floyd!" LMAO so since 2009 Floyd somehow stayed in his prime and didnt age??? GTFO


NO EXCUSES FOR NOBODY.


u see, i dont see any explaination as to if pac wins then no excuses either. u only stated bradley and floyd then at the end u put no excuses for nobody. maybe u cant read??

Pacquiao is not mention in that context because almost NOBODY IS SAYING "WELL IF PACQUIAO WINS NO CREDIT FOR BEATING FLOYD BECAUSE HIS OLD" OR "IF PACQUIAO WINS NO CREDIT BECAUSE BRADLEY IS SHOT FOR THE WAR WITH PROVO".

Damn near nobody is saying so no need to mention that. However clowns want to discredit Bradley or Mayweather should they beat Pacquiao even though Pacquiao just proved his chin is still good and still has alot left in him.

At the end I said NOBODY so that included everyone.