Bradley vs Pacquiao II, no excuses for the loser.

[shacasulu]

Pacquiao showed he still got something left by beating a limited but tough and solid fighter in Rios.

Good job by Pacquiao in treating a C level fighter like a C level fighter.

Pacquiao I think also answered the chin question if he it was dented or broken. He said he got hurt but we never saw him wobble ever which I remember was the case with Hatton when after Mayweather knocked him out, Hatton's chin was not the same. Feather fisted natural lightweight Lazcano damn near knocked out Hatton.

Pacquiao is back and hopefully fights either Bradley or Mayweather.

If its Bradley I'll be excited because I never saw this wide lopsided win for Pacquiao. The fight was closer than you think and Bradley was not given credit for his body and head shots. If the rematch happens and Bradley wins no excuses of "Manny is shot now so Bradley gets no credit!" BS. NO EXCUSES

If its Mayweather well the fight is a lil late and I know clowns here talking about "Pacquiao is not in his prime so, no credit to Floyd!" LMAO so since 2009 Floyd somehow stayed in his prime and didnt age??? GTFO


NO EXCUSES FOR NOBODY.

[Evol]

so no excuses if bradley or floyd wins but u left out pacman?? yea gtfo.

[shacasulu]

so no excuses if bradley or floyd wins but u left out pacman?? yea gtfo.

I said "NO EXCUSES FOR NODODY" meaning no excuses for Mayweather, Bradley, and Pacquiao.

Are you a moron that cant read???

[F!x]

The problem is Pacquiao already beat Bradley and got badly robbed. It means he's not immune to getting robbed just because of his star status so it may well happen again. And Bradley isn't a fan-fave fighter, he's not exciting to watch so is it worth the effort for Manny? Would he be motivated going into a Bradley rematch knowing he already beat the guy fairly easily last time and put him in a wheelchair?

But because Bradley is Top Rank I could see the rematch being made - it may well have been Arum's plan all along to get Bradley a W against Pac and then have a rematch which he hoped (at the time) would sell incredibly well. But really, who wants to watch that fight? The last fight Bradley was running for his life in most rounds, it wasn't entertaining stuff. Can't see the rematch selling well at all.

[Pugilist95]

Pacquiao still wins easily imo.

[shacasulu]

The problem is Pacquiao already beat Bradley and got badly robbed. It means he's not immune to getting robbed just because of his star status so it may well happen again. And Bradley isn't a fan-fave fighter, he's not exciting to watch so is it worth the effort for Manny? Would he be motivated going into a Bradley rematch knowing he already beat the guy fairly easily last time and put him in a wheelchair?

But because Bradley is Top Rank I could see the rematch being made - it may well have been Arum's plan all along to get Bradley a W against Pac and then have a rematch which he hoped (at the time) would sell incredibly well. But really, who wants to watch that fight? The last fight Bradley was running for his life in most rounds, it wasn't entertaining stuff. Can't see the rematch selling well at all.

Again most people IMO are not giving credit to Bradley's work. His body shots and headshots were not getting the credit because they were not really hard or didnt sound hard.

For instance in round 7 Bradley clearly won that round, he didnt dominate but he clearly won it yet you had the HBO crew swinging on Pacquiao's nuts and called the round for Pacquiao.

Since there is actually not alot of objectivity in the scoring criteria its not ****** if people like Brian Kenny saw Bradley win the fight.

Its the HARD PUNCHES VS SCORING POINTS debate which if you actually read the judging criteria it doesnt favor any side of the debate.

I know clowns going to say "BUT BUT ITS NOT AMATEUR BOXING!!!" THEN CHANGE THE FREAKIN JUDGING CRITERIA BECAUSE THE JUDGING CRITERIA DOESNT SPECIFY THAT HARDER PUNCHES WINS THE FIGHTS.

I want either Bradley vs Pacquaio II or Mayweather vs Pacquaio.

[pnksntdead]

exactly which head and body shots by bradley were you talking about? some fool tried to put a highlight of bradley's shots during that fight in another thread and he had to include punches landed on pacs arm and shoulder due to the lack of cleanly landed shots. as for excuses, pac wasn't the one riding a wheelchair after the fight, claiming he hurt both feet (after running around the ring for most of fight). I want the rematch too, maybe bradley will do better this time but let's not fool ourselves into believing that bradley did anything in the first one. rios did more damage on pac than tim did.

[Bushbaby]

Lets get dis straight right now. No excuses if Bradley/Pacman 2 happens, I agree with that.

But if Floyd/Pacman happens Now? Floyd gets no credit when he wins, period. None. To little too late. Freebies don't deserve credit.

[shacasulu]

Lets get dis straight right now. No excuses if Bradley/Pacman 2 happens, I agree with that.

But if Floyd/Pacman happens Now? Floyd gets no credit when he wins, period. None. To little too late. Freebies don't deserve credit.

But credit to Pacquiao despite Floyd being past his prime too???

GTFO

[Bushbaby]

But credit to Pacquiao despite Floyd being past his prime too???

GTFO

If Pacman were to somehow manage to beat Floyd, it would be a monumental upset so of course he'd deserve credit because he should not beat Floyd.