-
-
I think Calzaghe was way too smart for Froch.
Calzaghe would find a way, as he always did to use his speed and great stamina to overwhelm Froch.
Froch does have the better resume though.Comment
-
What's laughable is that this is even debated at all. As a fighter, Calzage is so much better than Froch its not even funny. Joe was a bonafide elite fight a long time. Froch may be the most overrated fighter in boxing. And the Frochidiots love to talk about his resume. What win does Froch have that trumps outclassing a primed Mikkel Kesser? What win does Froch have that trumps moving up and taking the universally recognized light heavyweight title from Hopkins. Hell, its 100yrs later and Froch has lost to Kessler and went life-n-death with a shot Kesser in the rematch. And he won't even move up to light heavy to fight
B-Hop or any other light heavy now. Froch is a joke. And the only bigger joke is his clueless worshipers who think actually think this guy is good.Comment
-
46-0 BEST SMW EVER!!! FROCH is a lower version of STEVE COLLINS,tough but very limited;JOE is skilled as few boxers ever step in a ring. The fight with KESSLER proved how good CALZAGHE was comparing to FROCH;BHOP? Who believes FROCH can beat him also at 48?BHOP vs PAVLIK is what can happen if FROCH step in a ring with the Philly fighter!!! C'mon haters,JOE is P4P material and future HOF,FROCH not... absolute NOT P4P material and not talking about future HOF!!! IMO FROCH can't beat BIKA too.Last edited by lutenco; 11-26-2013, 11:13 AM.Comment
-
Either get your son back in the ring to prove himself, or shut your mouth, old man.Comment
-
Ward is the only guy who could beat Joe.Comment
Tweet
Comment