Golovkin would kill Froch at 168

[Light_Speed]

Golovkin is just as easy to hit as Froch, if not easier.

Hell no. GGG keeps his hands up and shows some head movement here and there.

[Ray*]

He has always been very easy to hit, I don't see how it was a shock to anyone.

Well shows you show the boxing IQ on Boxingscene is quite low, Froch has to one of the most easiest fighters to hit at the moment. It doesn't really take a genius to work that one out.

[way2strong]

fan boys make it hard to enjoy GGG just shut up and let the man do his thing he hasn't even been in the ring with a top 10 mw stop yelling his name before he ends up getting canelo'ed ... those smw's are no joke if they cut down to 160 you better believe everyone across the ring is going to sleep

[Pain~Lucy]

I think froch is easier fight for golovkin than groves due to style

[HeroBando]

fan boys make it hard to enjoy GGG just shut up and let the man do his thing he hasn't even been in the ring with a top 10 mw stop yelling his name before he ends up getting canelo'ed ... those smw's are no joke if they cut down to 160 you better believe everyone across the ring is going to sleep

Macklin was clear cut top 10. Stevens and Proksa were also Ring top 10, but much more questionable. But remember how terrified Dirrell was of Stevens

[Spray_resistant]

He has always been very easy to hit, I don't see how it was a shock to anyone.

I know he always has been, people really like to over exaggerate after a fight especially one with controversy, Froch has great late rd stamina and when a fighter slows a bit he has a much better chance as we saw.

Sure it was a bad stoppage but Groves faded but Froch was fresh and landing harder and more frequently, he most likely on his way to a controversy free stoppage so I don't see how we can rate GGG's chances based on what we normally see from Froch.

[Godsfly]

if you can't see the EXTREME speed difference between golovkin and groves i would argue that you're pretty much blind.

groves has much more speed not only with his hands but also with his legs.

it's like comparing day to night...........

the speed is what was causing froch trouble (many of those shots froch simply could not see because they were lightning)

golovkin is a much slower smaller guy (& to be honest who's to say that he hits harder then groves at smw) groves is a lot more athletic then golovkin...........


joke.

[Light_Speed]

fan boys make it hard to enjoy GGG just shut up and let the man do his thing he hasn't even been in the ring with a top 10 mw

Macklin. Made him look like he didn't belong in the top 100.

if you can't see the EXTREME speed difference between golovkin and groves i would argue that you're pretty much blind.

groves has much more speed not only with his hands but also with his legs.

it's like comparing day to night...........

the speed is what was causing froch trouble (many of those shots froch simply could not see because they were lightning)

golovkin is a much slower smaller guy (& to be honest who's to say that he hits harder then groves at smw) groves is a lot more athletic then golovkin...........


joke.

It's not just speed that causes Froch trouble, it's ring intelligence and accuracy. Dirrell is faster than Ward yet Ward did better against Froch. These unorthodox fighters often get exposed by fundamentally sound boxers.

[Godsfly]

utter joke.................

[Dirk Diggler UK]

This is typical reactionary ****.

Golovkin hasn't fought anyone. He seems to get better the more he doesn't fight anyone. It's like the Paul Williams disease