Comments Thread For: Stevens Views Golovkin As An Overrated 'Hype Job'

[HeroBando]

I'm sorry you can't make see what is not there I don't see greatness in golovkin. And I thought you and others would wait on the outcome of the stevens vs golovkin fight to start voicing your opinions, but what was I off the mark about? I said if stevens could take his punch and land his own he had a chance of winning, stevens did neither he was hurt early and couldn't land his left hook because golovkin kept his right plastered to the side of his face throughout most of the fight and stevens appeared to want to quit when he couldn't get golovkin out of there early, but it was far from an impressive performance by golovkin having a wounded, green, clueless fighter in front of him but still was unable to get him out of there is proof positive that he doesn't know how to exploit golden opportunities when giving to him on a platter. Golovkin is skill deficient and just a very limited fighter himself he does not have an impressive or exceptional offense or defense which means he is just a decent fighter even his power is obviously overrated, Im sorry I don't see greatness at all and If stevens was the bum that most of you claim he is and most of you had golovkin destroying him easy in 4rds or just by brutal ko but none of that happened, golovkin wasn't even able to get the bum as you all claim he is out of there when he was virtually out cold, what does that say about your great fighter golovkin if he couldn't decisively beat a bum?

I don't know what fight you watched. Maybe you too were busy writing your next novel to pay attention?

You expected a tough fight for him, he ran roughshod over Stevens and you're less impressed than you started? Sounds like you're having trouble making a little sense. My advice, keep it simple, concise. It'll help your focus problems

[dray435]

[IMG]http://content.hollywire.com/sites/default/files/*****-mad-meme-election.jpg[/IMG]

Mad? no not at all, stevens didn't do what I said he needed to do to win and that is be able to take golovkins punch and land his own, he was unable to do either.

[dray435]

I don't know what fight you watched. Maybe you too were busy writing your next novel to pay attention?

You expected a tough fight for him, he ran roughshod over Stevens and you're less impressed than you started? Sounds like you're having trouble making a little sense. My advice, keep it simple, concise. It'll help your focus problems

Ran roughshod what fight were you watching? I don't call that running roughshod at all he won the fight but it was far from an impressive decisive win, because you lie to yourself about golovkin doesn't mean I am going to do the same, I was simply not impressed. Golovkin is a very limited fighter at best his punch is his best asset and that quite honestly is overrated.

[HeroBando]

Ran roughshod what fight were you watching? I don't call that running roughshod at all he won the fight but it was far from an impressive decisive win, because you lie to yourself about golovkin doesn't mean I am going to do the same, I was simply not impressed. Golovkin is a very limited fighter at best his punch is his best asset and that quite honestly is overrated.

That's a sign of agenda's at play, when you see a different fight that everyone else. But whatever, come back next time you think GGG is facing a threat lol.

[dray435]

That's a sign of agenda's at play, when you see a different fight that everyone else. But whatever, come back next time you think GGG is facing a threat lol.

The only difference is you guys are novices and green and couldn't tell a great fighter if he knocked you unconscious,I personally have been watching boxing for over 30 years and can identify a potentially great fighter just by watching him fight a few times I have seen golovkin fight a few times and there is nothing to suggest that he is or will ever be a great fighter.

[dray435]

That's a sign of agenda's at play, when you see a different fight that everyone else. But whatever, come back next time you think GGG is facing a threat lol.

Sign of an agenda? Trust me I am not here to establish a new world order only to give my honest opinion about a fighter that many believe to be the next great but I don't see that at all.

[Holywarrior]

After tonight I can see why people aren't very impressed. OH well hes still one of my faves and hed still beat the other guys at middleweight

[HeroBando]

Sign of an agenda? Trust me I am not here to establish a new world order only to give my honest opinion about a fighter that many believe to be the next great but I don't see that at all.

It's the loaded lingo you use, you know, trollish exaggerations, the imaginary fight you watched, etc. Better luck next time

[dray435]

That's a sign of agenda's at play, when you see a different fight that everyone else. But whatever, come back next time you think GGG is facing a threat lol.

Honestly if kelly pavlik has not allowed alcohol to erode his skills this would the prime time to come back because I believe pavlik would have beat golovkin prime for prime kelly pavlik crushes him in my opinion, but that may just be wishful thinking because he may be to far gone by now.

[Foreign Soil]

The only difference is you guys are novices and green and couldn't tell a great fighter if he knocked you unconscious,I personally have been watching boxing for over 30 years and can identify a potentially great fighter just by watching him fight a few times I have seen golovkin fight a few times and there is nothing to suggest that he is or will ever be a great fighter.

Been watching boxing over 30 years? Must be part of that racist crew of yesteryear, eh dray?