Dude, Pac got ICED in a very evenM back and forth fight because his technique is amateurish% and he fights like a goddamn ape. I don't need JMM and Nacho to tell me what happen or didn't because I saw it for myself. And have seen the same flaws in Pac ever since the late 90s, when I started following him.
Comments Thread For: Pacquiao's Adviser Devalues Bradley For "Boring" Win
Collapse
-
LMAO,if you believe Pwill Lara was a closer fight then Pac Bradley it's your right..I for one do not..
The judges have the final say,I said I felt it was a robbery..I'm not ****** enough tho to believe because I feel that,Pwill did not win..Same with Alexander Kotelnik..Which I thought was a big robbery,hell I thought Kotelnik did better then Matt's against Alexander..Does not change the fact(key word fact)that Alexander won the fight dip ****..
As for Pac Bradley..1-3 rds could have went either way rds 7-9 could have went either way..The only clear rds in that fight were,4-6 for Pac and 10-12 for Bradley..That's just my opinion..As far as what's set in stone,Bradley won a close decision over Pac..He should want to handle that(if he can)..
On press row there were more 11-1 for Pac than 7-5 for Pac + draw + all Bradley wins.
^^^ That's a routComment
-
Dude, Pac got ICED in a very evenM back and forth fight because his technique is amateurish% and he fights like a goddamn ape. I don't need JMM and Nacho to tell me what happen or didn't because I saw it for myself. And have seen the same flaws in Pac ever since the late 90s, when I started following him.Last edited by The Big Dunn; 10-15-2013, 12:44 PM.Comment
-
Dude, Pac got ICED in a very evenM back and forth fight because his technique is amateurish% and he fights like a goddamn ape. I don't need JMM and Nacho to tell me what happen or didn't because I saw it for myself. And have seen the same flaws in Pac ever since the late 90s, when I started following him.
Regardless, it's just a general principle: people will lie in self serving ways, not so much to make themselves look badComment
-
Lol. This place has some of the most ridiculous opinions and worst made up stories I've ever seen.Comment
-
He said originally which is false. And PAC wanted Marquez 5 and only made that offer to Bradley because Marquez declined. They tried to pay him back by stealing the opponent he wanted.
Lol. This place has some of the most ridiculous opinions and worst made up stories I've ever seen.Comment
-
Well Marquez is a much more lucrative, much more interesting, and much harder fight for him, so I'm glad he tried that first.Comment
-
My Bad
I stand corrected PBP. I confused the recent turndown by Bradley to fight Pacquiao. It's probably spurred by my general dislike for Bradley's fighting style and subsequent controversial wins. BTW, your people skills could use some work! Lol!!Comment
-
Comment
-
Thats not true! In boxing if youre winning the fight by 1 point and get brutally KO'd then youve won the fight because you were leading by that 1 point. History will remember it that wayComment
Comment