Why does Lederman always have to exaggerate with his scorecards?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • $Bullsfam$
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Oct 2009
    • 10252
    • 813
    • 630
    • 46,956

    #31
    Lederman is a joke. He had pac winning every fight with JMM and had calzaghe beating hopkins. It just goe to show if all you do is go forward and throw more punches he will give you the nod.

    Smh at all the pac nuthuggers coming back out calling jmm a whiner. Still butthurt jmm KOd their hero



    Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

    Comment

    • KeepItObjective
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Sep 2013
      • 1640
      • 60
      • 51
      • 1,888

      #32
      Originally posted by $Natedatpkid$
      Lederman is a joke. He had pac winning every fight with JMM and had calzaghe beating hopkins. It just goe to show if all you do is go forward and throw more punches he will give you the nod.

      Smh at all the pac nuthuggers coming back out calling jmm a whiner. Still butthurt jmm KOd their hero



      Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android
      SMH u mad.... JMM a one trick pony he has Pac to thank otherwise nobody would care for him! He should just be thankful that he got all those rematches to make a name for himself!

      Comment

      • flat1985
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 3623
        • 79
        • 59
        • 12,950

        #33
        Originally posted by -Kev-
        Exactly in what way am I biased? That makes zero sense.

        In one fight, where people claim robbery, I give Bradley the benefit of the doubt and had it a draw.

        In anther fighter, which some people had Bradley winning wide, I don't agree and had it a draw.

        So who am I being biased towards? Are you just using the word without even knowing what it means?
        You are ****ting on Pac basically again, I had Pac winning and Bradley beating JMM ( I am a marquez fan as well)

        Comment

        • -Kev-
          this is boxing
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Dec 2006
          • 39960
          • 5,045
          • 1,449
          • 234,543

          #34
          Originally posted by KeepItObjective
          SMH u mad.... JMM a one trick pony he has Pac to thank otherwise nobody would care for him! He should just be thankful that he got all those rematches to make a name for himself!
          He beat Pacquiao, Barrera, Casamayor, Diaz, John*, Salido, Sanchez just to name a few. Also, his LW reign was way more legit than beating just a David Diaz. He became The Ring champ there and then defended it against the #1 ranked Juan Diaz.

          Comment

          • Money_May
            Banned
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jun 2011
            • 14683
            • 317
            • 264
            • 22,957

            #35
            Originally posted by KeepItObjective
            SMH u mad.... JMM a one trick pony he has Pac to thank otherwise nobody would care for him! He should just be thankful that he got all those rematches to make a name for himself!
            what a **** poster at least this post confirms you're just a troll

            Comment

            • RiC-DiC
              Swiftlamic Extremist
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Mar 2013
              • 2205
              • 170
              • 438
              • 8,772

              #36
              I honestly had it 118-110. I only gave Marquez the last 2 and I thought the first could have gone either way but I gave it to Bradley for his activity.

              Comment

              • A-Wolf
                This One Can See
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Nov 2011
                • 6759
                • 265
                • 337
                • 61,371

                #37
                Lederman is a complete schmuck. Great guy but a schmuck.

                Always has been.

                Comment

                • A-Wolf
                  This One Can See
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Nov 2011
                  • 6759
                  • 265
                  • 337
                  • 61,371

                  #38
                  Originally posted by $Natedatpkid$
                  Lederman is a joke. He had pac winning every fight with JMM and had calzaghe beating hopkins. It just goe to show if all you do is go forward and throw more punches he will give you the nod.

                  Smh at all the pac nuthuggers coming back out calling jmm a whiner. Still butthurt jmm KOd their hero



                  Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android
                  ^^^^^ Literally Lederman's criteria.

                  Comment

                  • Curtiz
                    Really Big ****s
                    • Apr 2009
                    • 907
                    • 55
                    • 9
                    • 7,174

                    #39
                    Originally posted by Lovci
                    A lot of people had it close. I had it a draw.

                    I gave Marquez, 1, 3, 5, 6, 10, 12

                    1 was clear and close, same with 3.

                    5, 6 depends how ou score fights. Bradley worked the jab well, but between the two rounds threw like 10power shots, and landed maybe 1, while Marquez landed some good shots here and there.

                    10 Marquez controlled it and stunned Bradley slightly.

                    12 Marquez dominated. Bradley didn't do anything as he thought he had it in the bag. I completely disagree with Kellerman that one big shot for Bradle in the last second seals the rd, making everything Marquez did irrelevant. What an idiot. He even went as far as to say you are an incompetent judge if you disagree.
                    how could you give marquez round 12

                    get off his ****

                    Comment

                    • BafanaBafana
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • May 2012
                      • 1662
                      • 53
                      • 40
                      • 7,860

                      #40
                      Originally posted by -Kev-
                      He beat Pacquiao, Barrera, Casamayor, Diaz, John*, Salido, Sanchez just to name a few. Also, his LW reign was way more legit than beating just a David Diaz. He became The Ring champ there and then defended it against the #1 ranked Juan Diaz.
                      Goes to show just how strong the lightweight division was back then... The last thing I remember from Diaz was Malinaggi rocking him around the ring.

                      That list of opponents is pretty weak once you remove Pacquiao. Do you even realize how old and (more importantly) shot Casamayor and Barrera were when Marquez fought them? As it is actually scored the the Barrera fight for Barrera, I thought he was clearly robbed in that fight. Salido was an unknown journeyman when Marquez fought him (even the current Salido wouldn't be a big win).

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP