Why does Lederman always have to exaggerate with his scorecards?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • AnimalisticMeth
    Casper the friendly Cotto
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jun 2009
    • 4867
    • 226
    • 50
    • 11,971

    #11
    I had it 116-112 for Bradley. Could see 117-111 or even 115-113 if you were being kind to Marquez but Bradley clrealy won.

    Comment

    • MPX309
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • May 2013
      • 2917
      • 101
      • 1
      • 12,045

      #12
      I was supporting Marquez but had it 116 - 112 to Bradley, for what it's worth

      Comment

      • -Kev-
        this is boxing
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Dec 2006
        • 39960
        • 5,045
        • 1,449
        • 234,543

        #13
        Originally posted by T18Z
        It wasn't close, you think Marquez vs Bradley and Pacquaio vs Bradley are both draws, your opinion is close to worthless and invalid, you are biased, end of. You are complaining because people don't share your dumb opinion/
        Exactly in what way am I biased? That makes zero sense.

        In one fight, where people claim robbery, I give Bradley the benefit of the doubt and had it a draw.

        In anther fighter, which some people had Bradley winning wide, I don't agree and had it a draw.

        So who am I being biased towards? Are you just using the word without even knowing what it means?

        Comment

        • STEELHEAD
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Nov 2004
          • 14730
          • 537
          • 478
          • 27,196

          #14
          i'm telling you. you young guys. lederman use to really be wacked with his scorecard. i was a critic of his years ago. use to think it was sad that he was in that position. can't believe he's still around! but he is something to laugh about.

          Comment

          • T18Z
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Apr 2013
            • 2073
            • 101
            • 66
            • 10,410

            #15
            Originally posted by -Kev-
            Exactly in what way am I biased? That makes zero sense.

            In one fight, where people claim robbery, I give Bradley the benefit of the doubt and had it a draw.

            In anther fighter, which some people had Bradley winning wide, I don't agree and had it a draw.

            So who am I being biased towards? Are you just using the word without even knowing what it means?
            I'll use a better word, you're ******.

            The fact you have Pacquaio vs Bradley + Marquez vs Bradley a draw, is pathetic. Why would you give him the benefit of the doubt? For what reason, rofl.

            Comment

            • ChampBox@PR
              Team Cotto
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Apr 2010
              • 7531
              • 274
              • 172
              • 14,602

              #16
              This indeed was an easy fight to score, rounds 1,3,11 clearly for Marquez, rounds 2,5,6,7,8,9,12 clearly for Bradley and rounds 4 and 10 close rounds. This could had been score from 115-113 all the way up to 117-111 for Bradley no draw, nor roberry.

              Marquez got outboxed simple as that!

              Comment

              • JDezi4
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jul 2010
                • 3822
                • 95
                • 194
                • 10,052

                #17
                People forget that Lederman has all the advantages none of the other judges have, he sees compubox, he sees all the different camera angles, he gets to watch the replays after each round, and most notably... ACCESS TO COMMENTARY

                He can hear Lampley tell the audience a punch landed that didn't and it will effect his scorecards

                AND HE CLEARLY HAS A SPECIFICATION FOR HOW HE SCORES FIGHTS... In his old age (just like Larry), he wants action... Whoever's throwing more punches wins the round

                Comment

                • Dirk Diggler UK
                  Deleted
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jun 2008
                  • 48836
                  • 1,312
                  • 693
                  • 58,902

                  #18
                  I couldn't watch it. He scores for whoever moves their hands most.

                  Comment

                  • -Kev-
                    this is boxing
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Dec 2006
                    • 39960
                    • 5,045
                    • 1,449
                    • 234,543

                    #19
                    Originally posted by T18Z
                    I'll use a better word, you're ******.

                    The fact you have Pacquaio vs Bradley + Marquez vs Bradley a draw, is pathetic. Why would you give him the benefit of the doubt? For what reason, rofl.
                    So you're backtracking now? You went to google and looked "biased" and saw you didn't even know what it meant? Now you are using a more brute word to make up for it.

                    Comment

                    • Fay
                      LETS GO CHAMP!!
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Apr 2010
                      • 11209
                      • 52
                      • 88
                      • 20,569

                      #20
                      The old man needs to retire it was a close fight.. I had it a draw

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP