Terrence Crawford Got No Love In Orlando

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

Quote:

Originally Posted by IronDanHamza

No I was referring to Burns.

He's not really an overly aggressive fighter, he's more of a boxer.

No way Crawford forces the fight, Burns will end up being the guy who's forcing but he's going to miss and not be overly aggressive.

Has dull written all over it.

But you never know.

if crawford doesnt force that fight and look specatular, hes pretty much writing his ticket to undercard tv. he'll be one of those many fighters talked about as being really good but never getting any coverage. the casamayors, the morenos, etc. and it'll totally be his fault unlike those other guys. hes got his shot. if he doesnt make it count its on him

If the fight happens overseas and is not televised by HBO he might be able to get away with it. Cause how many Americans will actually be watching besides us on a stream?


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

[-PBP-]

Crawford vs Burns will be slow paced. Crawford is awkward and can switch hit. Burns will be off balance and hesitant to throw.

If there is going to be any action it will have to come from TC.

[Humean]

No I was referring to Burns.

He's not really an overly aggressive fighter, he's more of a boxer.

No way Crawford forces the fight, Burns will end up being the guy who's forcing but he's going to miss and not be overly aggressive.

Has dull written all over it.

But you never know.

At his best Burns is aggressive for a boxer, he isn't one of those cagey boxer/counter punchers that you see so often as he is constantly trying to land the jab with real authority. At his worst, like against Beltran, he is overly aggressive, leading with body shots with his chin flying high in the air. I just think that if Crawford is more inclined to be aggressive than people are giving him credit for then it could be a pretty exciting fight, especially if Burns keeps missing. If Crawford really is so settled in his ways of being overly cautious then it will be a snoozer. I'm optimistic for the former.

[Kagami Taiga]

Crawford vs Burns will be slow paced. Crawford is awkward and can switch hit. Burns will be off balance and hesitant to throw.

If there is going to be any action it will have to come from TC.

i dont mind if its slow paced. but if hes gonna box, crawford has to box his ass off. he has to be reasoning well in the ring, setting traps, effective counters, proper foot work. im not expecting to see adrien broner or mikey garcia in there. i can settle for rigondeaux/,moreno. but if thats what hes gonna do then he needs to do it right. cuz that **** he pulled saturday wont cut it.

[soul_survivor]

He's a good young fighter but he should have gotten that guy outta there. He had him completely ovrrmatched yet he fought at a slow, steady pace even though there was literally no danger. He has a lot to learn.

End Thread here

[IronDanHamza]

At his best Burns is aggressive for a boxer, he isn't one of those cagey boxer/counter punchers that you see so often as he is constantly trying to land the jab with real authority. At his worst, like against Beltran, he is overly aggressive, leading with body shots with his chin flying high in the air. I just think that if Crawford is more inclined to be aggressive than people are giving him credit for then it could be a pretty exciting fight, especially if Burns keeps missing. If Crawford really is so settled in his ways of being overly cautious then it will be a snoozer. I'm optimistic for the former.

Yeah he's not an "unaggressive" (If that's a word) kind of fighter but I wouldn't class him as aggressive.

He's a boxer first and foremost, with a high guard and boxs behind a techinal jab.

He's not going to go at Crawford and throw a load of punches when he get's caught everytime like when he fought the Columbian (I forget his name).

I think the chances of it being boring are extremely high.

It would be a tactical fight and neither punch overly hard.

[The Gambler1981]

Yeah he's not an "unaggressive" (If that's a word) kind of fighter but I wouldn't class him as aggressive.

He's a boxer first and foremost, with a high guard and boxs behind a techinal jab.

He's not going to go at Crawford and throw a load of punches when he get's caught everytime like when he fought the Columbian (I forget his name).

I think the chances of it being boring are extremely high.

It would be a tactical fight and neither punch overly hard.

That is pretty much it, although you do never know. Usually though in a contest of boxers one will be better then the other one is essentially SOL with the guy that is losing only realizing that much too late to really do anything about it, if they even can because sometimes guys can just never get out of their box.