How close was Bradley v Pacquiao?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SplitSecond
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Nov 2009
    • 23151
    • 1,715
    • 1,187
    • 85,044

    #101
    Originally posted by !! Anorak
    Rewatched this fight with conflicting memories. One was that Pacquaio had dominated, the other was that it was a tedious fight I didn't want to watch again.

    HUH? Those two don't add up.

    Seeing it again, Ping Ping's work rate was exceptionally low for him. Even though he was generally able to do what he wanted with Bradley, he was only working for around a minute a round, sometimes less. Bradley landing six jabs isn't amazing, but if that's all that's happening, he's winning the round by default.

    It didn't help the outrageous HBO commentary, which talked about everything Pac did and nothing in reverse, especially the virtual fellating of Max Keller****.


    "And Manny PACQUIAO just WINKED at ME, JIM!!"

    Yeah, Max... because the judges scoring the fight score it on winks.

    Even when the guy missed, they cheered it. And I was under the impression that Bradley was rocked more than he was.... in retrospect, we now know he'll carry on firing back, even when totally KTFO.

    Take a look, for example, at the first round... **** all happens, and Ping Ping is frequently off-balance and misses... he lands three decent shots in the last fifteen seconds, but that's all, and Jim calls them "booms", as if the fight is being commented on by a six-year-old.

    It's by no means a performance where Bradley wins seven rounds by domination. But it's certainly a performance where you could argue he nicks seven rounds by workrate alone.
    bradley and pacquiao land about the same number of punches in those inactive first 2 minutes

    before pacquiao even landed the three big lefts, bradley had done what? landed what? he backpeddled(another reason to not give him the round) and maybe landed 2 jabs, a body punch and a weak uppercut, pacquiao had landed a counter lead left(which everyone misses), a body shot of his own and maybe some jabs too, along with the obvious much more damaging 2-3 blows at the end of the round

    you really have to just not know how to score a fight to give bradley the first round

    the pacquiao wasn't doing anything until the last 30 seconds where he beats the **** outta bradley so bradley deserves the round excuse is getting ****** now, bradley wasn't landing anything in those moments to warrant sht half the time, he just moved and postured and threw crappy jabs at air or gloves

    what did you guys score oscar-mayweather btw?
    you had oscar winning every round right?
    Last edited by SplitSecond; 09-26-2013, 02:27 PM.

    Comment

    • brickcityboxing
      Matthysse is a BEAST!!
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jul 2012
      • 3090
      • 143
      • 24
      • 9,650

      #102
      Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
      The evidence of the fight taking place. Garcia vs Matthysse hadn't taken place. You can't compare predictions to fights which have already happened.

      There'll always be a minority of hipsters who try to go against the grain just to try to be cool
      Except the hipsters were the Mathysse fans ... Garcia was the champion, had the better resume and was more known "mainstream" nothing "hipster" about him. Mathysse claim to fame was eating exotic meats, knocking jokers out, and never getting a fair shake cause "the man" was always holding him back ... Very hipster... Anyways I can see we aren't going to see eye to eye (I tried). You're to caught up in the example I used and not in the actual point I was trying to make ... Minority , right ,wrong,1 against 100 etc.... Take it easy.

      Comment

      • lfc19titles
        Undisputed Champion
        • Mar 2010
        • 8731
        • 725
        • 628
        • 94,838

        #103
        pac cleanly won, only die hard bradley fans and floyd fans can spout their rubbish bradley won

        I believe 99 percent of press row already had pac winning lol

        Comment

        • brick wall
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Feb 2008
          • 6480
          • 259
          • 35
          • 24,574

          #104
          Originally posted by brickcityboxing
          Why not ? What you said was if you're "only 1 or 2 people who believe something and 100 other people think otherwise then there is something wrong with you". Your words not mine. Doesn't matter if it didn't happen yet or already did. You are basing your argument on the "fact" that if you are in the extreme minority you are wrong. Because 100 other people think a certain way it must be true. I never believed in Santa Clause. By your logic I would've been wrong in 2nd grade.

          now you've turned to sta claus to justify your ****** logic

          my post has something to do with the topic at hand...a very specific event. if you have a problem following the flow of discussion that's your problem not mine. you deviate from the topic which is ******.

          Comment

          • Dirk Diggler UK
            Deleted
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jun 2008
            • 48836
            • 1,312
            • 693
            • 58,902

            #105
            Originally posted by brickcityboxing
            Except the hipsters were the Mathysse fans ... Garcia was the champion, had the better resume and was more known "mainstream" nothing "hipster" about him. Mathysse claim to fame was eating exotic meats, knocking jokers out, and never getting a fair shake cause "the man" was always holding him back ... Very hipster... Anyways I can see we aren't going to see eye to eye (I tried). You're to caught up in the example I used and not in the actual point I was trying to make ... Minority , right ,wrong,1 against 100 etc.... Take it easy.
            The hipsters I refer to are the ones who think people are wrong about Pacquiao because they were "influenced" by HBO or whatever. I personally didn't watch it on HBO and had music on. I thought Pacquaio was coasting cos Bradley could do nothing with him.

            Comment

            • brickcityboxing
              Matthysse is a BEAST!!
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jul 2012
              • 3090
              • 143
              • 24
              • 9,650

              #106
              Originally posted by brick wall
              now you've turned to sta claus to justify your ****** logic

              my post has something to do with the topic at hand...a very specific event. if you have a problem following the flow of discussion that's your problem not mine. you deviate from the topic which is ******.
              Who's sta clause ?

              Comment

              • HeroBando
                I love Mayweather
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Oct 2011
                • 17452
                • 236
                • 0
                • 24,430

                #107
                Originally posted by brickcityboxing
                That would actually be a pretty good experiment...ask 3 different people who thought pacquiao dominated what rounds they thought Bradley won and when you get the results show them 7 different rounds between the 3 of them they had Bradley winning... And then let them argue it out.
                Dude look at these scores:

                http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Ma...imothy_Bradley

                Take out Skip Bayless, and the number of 11-1 for Pac = all 7-5 for Pac + all draws + all Bradley wins!

                That's a fcuking rout. This is 9-3 on average, there's no discussion. Even Floyd Cotto was closer than that on average.

                Comment

                • SplitSecond
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Nov 2009
                  • 23151
                  • 1,715
                  • 1,187
                  • 85,044

                  #108
                  Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                  The hipsters I refer to are the ones who think people are wrong about Pacquiao because they were "influenced" by HBO or whatever. I personally didn't watch it on HBO and had music on. I thought Pacquaio was coasting cos Bradley could do nothing with him.
                  i watched a bit of it commentated by top rank, and they were really pro bradley

                  i couldn't stand the ******ity so went back to hbo where steward showed alot more sense, although it seemed to me at times kellerman tried his darnest to be a bradley fanboy, he just couldn't without seeming like a complete jockstrap

                  Comment

                  • brickcityboxing
                    Matthysse is a BEAST!!
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jul 2012
                    • 3090
                    • 143
                    • 24
                    • 9,650

                    #109
                    Originally posted by HeroBando
                    Dude look at these scores:

                    http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Ma...imothy_Bradley

                    Take out Skip Bayless, and the number of 11-1 for Pac = all 7-5 for Pac + all draws + all Bradley wins!

                    That's a fcuking rout. This is 9-3 on average, there's no discussion. Even Floyd Cotto was closer than that on average.
                    I bet you they all had Bradley winning different rounds too... Which means a lot of rounds weren't CLEAR ... Which means... It could've and did go Bradley's way. If PAC didnt give up the last 4 of 12 there would be no discussion.

                    Comment

                    • jai mari078
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Jun 2006
                      • 2935
                      • 82
                      • 0
                      • 9,440

                      #110
                      Originally posted by SBleeder
                      9-3 Pacquiao.
                      The fight wasn't close at all and anyone who says it was is blind!

                      Even Bradley knew he lost after the fight , he was apologizing to Arum after the fight.

                      It was a blatant robbery!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP