Comments Thread For: Sulaiman: Floyd-Canelo Winner Should Face Pacquiao

[J The UnBiased]

Of the 144 polled: 87 thought it was a draw or Pac won while 93 thought it was a draw or JMM won. Since 93>87, the bolded post above is incorrect. THe correct sentence is:

A majority of those polled thought it was a draw or JMM won.

ANother way to put it: A majority of those polled thought it was a draw or Manny LOST.

check mate.

[HeroBando]

Of the 144 polled: 87 thought it was a draw or Pac won while 93 thought it was a draw or JMM won. Since 93>87, the bolded post above is incorrect. THe correct sentence is:

A majority of those polled thought it was a draw or JMM won.

ANother way to put it: A majority of those polled thought it was a draw or Manny LOST.

Here's the difference: you post something factual, and I don't go crying and denying it for 4 pages, while building strawman. You're right above, and I was right to say the a majority did not have JMM winning. They're not contradictory.

[HeroBando]

check mate.

You didn't follow the convo. He called me out on a true statement, been backtracking for pages since.

[Fetta]

Of the 144 polled: 87 thought it was a draw or Pac won while 93 thought it was a draw or JMM won. Since 93>87, the bolded post above is incorrect. THe correct sentence is:

A majority of those polled thought it was a draw or JMM won.

ANother way to put it: A majority of those polled thought it was a draw or Manny LOST.

57 out of 144=40% JMM winning
87 out of 144=60% JMM not winning.

51 out of 144=35% MP winning
93 out of 144=65% MP not winning

I have no idea what they are seeing but OK

Maybe take out the draws but still 57>51 majority vote for JMM and thats just this little poll. I havent found one where Pac wins the poll

[HeroBando]

57 out of 144=40% JMM winning
87 out of 144=60% JMM not winning.

51 out of 144=35% MP winning
93 out of 144=65% MP not winning

I have no idea what they are seeing but OK

Maybe take out the draws but still 57>51 majority vote for JMM and thats just this little poll. I havent found one where Pac wins the poll

Flo mo Seminar: How to make 57 > 87

[Fetta]

Totally agree with that statement. Money should have fought Margs instead Baldomir.

lineal champ no matter how you look at it. I would rather be lineal champ then whatever belt Marg had, was it WBO.

[Fetta]

Flo mo Seminar: How to make 57 > 87

Dunn already broke it down for you. Read my whole post kid. Looks like today isnt your day. Log off for a minute

[HeroBando]

Dunn already broke it down for you. Read my whole post kid. Looks like today isnt your day. Log off for a minute

Unfortunately Dunn was sent packing with his strawman

[The Big Dunn]

Here's the difference: you post something factual, and I don't go crying and denying it for 4 pages, while building strawman. You're right above, and I was right to say the a majority did not have JMM winning. They're not contradictory.

No you weren't. The majority is not determeined by counting draws against JMM only. I pointed this out when I 1st broke the stats out.

The number of people polled was 144-you counted 36 against JMM. They weren't against JMM. They were nuetral. SO either don't include them (57>51) or include them for BOTH (93>87).

Your statement was based, as you admitted, on the draws being counted ONCE. Hence you kept repeating that 87>51. Thats why It was wrong.

Can you understand this?

[Fetta]

No you weren't. The majority is not determeined by counting draws against JMM only. I pointed this out when I 1st broke the stats out.

The number of people polled was 144-you counted 36 against JMM. They weren't against JMM. They were nuetral. SO either don't include them (57>51) or include them for BOTH (93>87).

Your statement was based, as you admitted, on the draws being counted ONCE. Hence you kept repeating that 87>51. Thats why It was wrong.

Can you understand this?

This is how i see it too. I have no idea what he sees. Maybe its just a pride thing now and he doesnt want to admit that a majority had JMM winning. I mean he showed the numbers