LMAO. I have no problem with him being delusional. Fighters after a loss quite often work their minds a certain way to overcome the loss and start the ability to regain their confidence. Since he said that, he is already thinking of making a comeback and not retiring. If he can convince himself that he was controlling the fght but made a fatal error, he will suddenly get the bug to fight again back.
Nathan Cleverly "i won first 2 rounds and was winning the third"
Collapse
-
LMAO. I have no problem with him being delusional. Fighters after a loss quite often work their minds a certain way to overcome the loss and start the ability to regain their confidence. Since he said that, he is already thinking of making a comeback and not retiring. If he can convince himself that he was controlling the fght but made a fatal error, he will suddenly get the bug to fight again back. -
Didn't you see the Mares fight at the weekend? or the Dawson-Stevenson fight? and those are only from this year never mind history.
Cleverly lost, but he went three or four rounds (9 minutes) and iirc cut his opponent.
Tbf Hatton was only referring to the second round, which while I think he lost was relatively competitive until the last 10 seconds.Comment
-
really? How? I think Cleverly was winning the first few rounds and catching Kovalev with some shots. Yes, then the fight was over, but to say Kovalev won every round is interesting to me because he barely touched Cleverly in the first 2 rounds.Comment
-
Tell Lucas Matthysse what it's like trying to win a decision against a US opponent in the States.Last edited by Weebler I; 08-26-2013, 02:04 PM.Comment
-
Like pac fans have taught me, I don't let KO's and KD's get in the way of scoring.
That's just ignorant.Comment
-
On the other side of the argument, he didn't disqualify, deduct a point, or even warn Kovalev for clobbering Cleverly while he was already down and clearly in no position to defend himself (Sir Joe certainly wasn't pleased, and made the point of using the dreaded finger point in Kovalev's direction to highlight his anger.) Nor did he even give him the time or opportunity to recover from an obviously damaging blow, which nobody could have faulted him for doing.Comment
-
Yes these too are flaws but they aren't exactly opposite sides of the coin. I'm pointing out what the ref did deliberately and consciously (fully aware he was making errors but doing them anyway), whilst you are pointing out what he didn't do (and can be excused for not noticing).On the other side of the argument, he didn't disqualify, deduct a point, or even warn Kovalev for clobbering Cleverly while he was already down and clearly in no position to defend himself (Sir Joe certainly wasn't pleased, and made the point of using the dreaded finger point in Kovalev's direction to highlight his anger.) Nor did he even give him the time or opportunity to recover from an obviously damaging blow, which nobody could have faulted him for doing.
Cheating requires a conscious choice to act wrongly, whereas incompetence is just plain ******ity.Comment
-
He did notice it since it was right in front of him and ran to stop Kovalev. He could've DQ'd Sergey had he wanted to, technically he should have and Cleverly should still have the belt, but he didn't.Yes these too are flaws but they aren't exactly opposite sides of the coin. I'm pointing out what the ref did deliberately and consciously (fully aware he was making errors but doing them anyway), whilst you are pointing out what he didn't do (and can be excused for not noticing).
Cheating requires a conscious choice to act wrongly, whereas incompetence is just plain ******ity.
Maybe if Clev had pulled some b1tch **** like Dirrell v Abraham or Hopkins v Dawson...Comment
Comment